2005Journal of medical imagingRequires access

Value of 64-slice spiral CT angiography in diagnosing arterial diseases of the lower extremities

Cheng Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To assess the role of 64-slice spiral CT angiography for lower limb arterial diseases and its technique superiority.Methods:28 cases of diseases of lower limb arteries were studied,the helical scans cover renal artery to the artery of the lower extremity.We used Siemens Wizard workstation for 3D reconstruction.And we analyed images with MPR,MIP,VR.In 21 cases,the manifestations of MSCTA were compared with that of conventional angiography.Results:Of the 441 segments,435 were assessable on both DSA and CTA.On DSA images,130 stenoocclusive segments(16 mild stenosis,12 moderate stenosis,22 severe stenosis,and 80 occlusion) were detected.With regard to segments that had more than moderate stenosis,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MIP were 99.1%?99.7%?99.5%.Conclusion:The assessment of angiography of diseases of lower limb arteries with 64-slice spiral CT is equal to DSA basically,it is a highly accurate and non-invasive angiography in diagnosing arterial diseases of the lower extremities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To assess the role of 64-slice spiral CT angiography for lower limb arterial diseases and its technique superiority.Methods:28 cases of diseases of lower limb arteries were studied,the helical scans cover renal artery to the artery of the lower extremity.We used Siemens Wizard workstation for 3D reconstruction.And we analyed images with MPR,MIP,VR.In 21 cases,the manifestations of MSCTA were compared with that of conventional angiography.Results:Of the 441 segments,435 were assessable on both DSA and CTA.On DSA images,130 stenoocclusive segments(16 mild stenosis,12 moderate stenosis,22 severe stenosis,and 80 occlusion) were detected.With regard to segments that had more than moderate stenosis,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MIP were 99.1%?99.7%?99.5%.Conclusion:The assessment of angiography of diseases of lower limb arteries with 64-slice spiral CT is equal to DSA basically,it is a highly accurate and non-invasive angiography in diagnosing arterial diseases of the lower extremities.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To assess the role of 64-slice spiral CT angiography for lower limb arterial diseases and its technique superiority.Methods:28 cases of diseases of lower limb arteries were studied,the helical scans cover renal artery to the artery of the lower extremity.We used Siemens Wizard workstation for 3D reconstruction.And we analyed images with MPR,MIP,VR.In 21 cases,the manifestations of MSCTA were compared with that of conventional angiography.Results:Of the 441 segments,435 were assessable on both DSA and CTA.On DSA images,130 stenoocclusive segments(16 mild stenosis,12 moderate stenosis,22 severe stenosis,and 80 occlusion) were detected.With regard to segments that had more than moderate stenosis,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MIP were 99.1%?99.7%?99.5%.Conclusion:The assessment of angiography of diseases of lower limb arteries with 64-slice spiral CT is equal to DSA basically,it is a highly accurate and non-invasive angiography in diagnosing arterial diseases of the lower extremities.

Key concepts: Medicine, Angiography, Stenosis, Radiology, Occlusion, Artery, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value of 64-slice spiral CT angiography in diagnosing arterial diseases of the lower extremities — Research Paper | ScholarLens