DEVELOPMENT OF 0.5% AZADIRACHTIN MICROENCAPSULE AND TEST FOR ITS ACTIVITY
Zhu Rong
Abstract
Zhu Rong
Abstract
0.5% azadirachtin microencapsules (Azadirachtin MC) manufactured with the method of common solid phase grinding are made from β-CD and azadirachtin. In a laboratory assay, the LC_(50) of Azadirachtin MC against the 4~(th) instar larvae of Pieris rapae were determined to be 4.3202±0.3180 mg/L and its CL_(0.95) 3.7389~4.9913 mg/L. P. rapae apparently refused to eat the food treated with Azadirachtin MC at 5~260 mg/L with an anti-feeding rate of 85.60%~82.44% and an anti-feeding index of 11.82~14.94. Field spray with Azadirachtin MC solution at 10, 6.25 and 4.55 mg/L gave a corrected control efficiency of (85.89%), 82.95% and 78.97%, respectively, as determined 3 days after the treatment and 81.86% 82.48% and 80.88% as determined 7 days after the treatment. In contrast, the control efficiency of Azadirachtin EC was 77.31% and that of Pardon was (84.38%). ANOVA showed that no significant difference was present among them at P=0.05.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
0.5% azadirachtin microencapsules (Azadirachtin MC) manufactured with the method of common solid phase grinding are made from β-CD and azadirachtin. In a laboratory assay, the LC_(50) of Azadirachtin MC against the 4~(th) instar larvae of Pieris rapae were determined to be 4.3202±0.3180 mg/L and its CL_(0.95) 3.7389~4.9913 mg/L. P. rapae apparently refused to eat the food treated with Azadirachtin MC at 5~260 mg/L with an anti-feeding rate of 85.60%~82.44% and an anti-feeding index of 11.82~14.94. Field spray with Azadirachtin MC solution at 10, 6.25 and 4.55 mg/L gave a corrected control efficiency of (85.89%), 82.95% and 78.97%, respectively, as determined 3 days after the treatment and 81.86% 82.48% and 80.88% as determined 7 days after the treatment. In contrast, the control efficiency of Azadirachtin EC was 77.31% and that of Pardon was (84.38%). ANOVA showed that no significant difference was present among them at P=0.05.
Key concepts: Azadirachtin, Instar, Pieris rapae, Toxicology, Larva, Horticulture, Chemistry, Animal science