2002•Journal of Sichuan UniversityRequires access

Machine Gun and Thread-bound Chinese Book-The Tension between Science and Chinese Learning in Early Republican Period from the Dispute of Chinese Learning Bibliography(II)

Zhi Feng Luo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In early 1923, Hu Shi and Liang Qi chao opened a Learning Bibliography for students from Qinghua University, which resulted in a dispute concerning the sorting out of Chinese classics. Participants in this dispute were mainly scholars with new ideas, hence the dispute could be viewed as an effort of integrating concepts within themselves. Both supporters and opponents of sorting out Chinese classics relied on science: Wu Zhihui, Kang Youwei and other senior scholars with different political and cultural stands emphasized Chinas urgent need of the material layer of science, while Lin Yutang and several young returned students from abroad, with different urderstandings of Learning, stressed more about the integrity of science(in fact, the spirit and appraches of science),and further advocated scientific Chinese Learning. Such academic phenomena reflected some super academic significance and should be studied in the historical framework of modern Chinese ideological evolution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In early 1923, Hu Shi and Liang Qi chao opened a Learning Bibliography for students from Qinghua University, which resulted in a dispute concerning the sorting out of Chinese classics. Participants in this dispute were mainly scholars with new ideas, hence the dispute could be viewed as an effort of integrating concepts within themselves. Both supporters and opponents of sorting out Chinese classics relied on science: Wu Zhihui, Kang Youwei and other senior scholars with different political and cultural stands emphasized Chinas urgent need of the material layer of science, while Lin Yutang and several young returned students from abroad, with different urderstandings of Learning, stressed more about the integrity of science(in fact, the spirit and appraches of science),and further advocated scientific Chinese Learning. Such academic phenomena reflected some super academic significance and should be studied in the historical framework of modern Chinese ideological evolution.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In early 1923, Hu Shi and Liang Qi chao opened a Learning Bibliography for students from Qinghua University, which resulted in a dispute concerning the sorting out of Chinese classics. Participants in this dispute were mainly scholars with new ideas, hence the dispute could be viewed as an effort of integrating concepts within themselves. Both supporters and opponents of sorting out Chinese classics relied on science: Wu Zhihui, Kang Youwei and other senior scholars with different political and cultural stands emphasized Chinas urgent need of the material layer of science, while Lin Yutang and several young returned students from abroad, with different urderstandings of Learning, stressed more about the integrity of science(in fact, the spirit and appraches of science),and further advocated scientific Chinese Learning. Such academic phenomena reflected some super academic significance and should be studied in the historical framework of modern Chinese ideological evolution.

Key concepts: Ideology, China, Chinese academy of sciences, Politics, Period (music), Classics, Literature, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Machine Gun and Thread-bound Chinese Book-The Tension between Science and Chinese Learning in Early Republican Period from the Dispute of Chinese Learning Bibliography(II) — Research Paper | ScholarLens