2006Zhonghua fangshe yixue yu fanghu zazhiRequires access

The clinical observation of hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization in the treatment of the advanced patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Yan Xiu-xin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization in the treatment of the advanced patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Fouty patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups, each group had 20 cases. The observed group was treated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in combination with hyperthermia, the control group with ordinary interventional chemotherapy and embolizing therapy. All patients received ADM 50~60 mg, MMC 6~8 mg, DDP 60~80 mg, 5-Fu 500 mg. Super-liquid iodided oil and transperent sponges were used. Results The efficacy with the observed group and control group were 75%(15/20) and 40%(8/20) respectively (P0.05). The survival rates of both groups for 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 years were 100%, 95%; 90%, 75%; 65%, 45%; 60%, 25% respectively, there were no significant difference in the survival rate for 0.5,1, 1.5 years (P0.05), but difference was statistically signiticant for 2 years (P0.05). There were no significant difference in side effects for both groups. Conclusion The efficacy in the treatment of the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization is better than with ordinary interventional chemotherapy and embolizing therapy, and its side effects is not increased. This method is a safe and effective treatment.;

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization in the treatment of the advanced patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Fouty patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups, each group had 20 cases. The observed group was treated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in combination with hyperthermia, the control group with ordinary interventional chemotherapy and embolizing therapy. All patients received ADM 50~60 mg, MMC 6~8 mg, DDP 60~80 mg, 5-Fu 500 mg. Super-liquid iodided oil and transperent sponges were used. Results The efficacy with the observed group and control group were 75%(15/20) and 40%(8/20) respectively (P0.05). The survival rates of both groups for 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 years were 100%, 95%; 90%, 75%; 65%, 45%; 60%, 25% respectively, there were no significant difference in the survival rate for 0.5,1, 1.5 years (P0.05), but difference was statistically signiticant for 2 years (P0.05). There were no significant difference in side effects for both groups. Conclusion The efficacy in the treatment of the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization is better than with ordinary interventional chemotherapy and embolizing therapy, and its side effects is not increased. This method is a safe and effective treatment.;

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization in the treatment of the advanced patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Fouty patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups, each group had 20 cases. The observed group was treated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in combination with hyperthermia, the control group with ordinary interventional chemotherapy and embolizing therapy. All patients received ADM 50~60 mg, MMC 6~8 mg, DDP 60~80 mg, 5-Fu 500 mg. Super-liquid iodided oil and transperent sponges were used. Results The efficacy with the observed group and control group were 75%(15/20) and 40%(8/20) respectively (P0.05). The survival rates of both groups for 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 years were 100%, 95%; 90%, 75%; 65%, 45%; 60%, 25% respectively, there were no significant difference in the survival rate for 0.5,1, 1.5 years (P0.05), but difference was statistically signiticant for 2 years (P0.05). There were no significant difference in side effects for both groups. Conclusion The efficacy in the treatment of the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization is better than with ordinary interventional chemotherapy and embolizing therapy, and its side effects is not increased. This method is a safe and effective treatment.;

Key concepts: Medicine, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Hyperthermia, Chemotherapy, Significant difference, Side effect (computer science), Clinical efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical observation of hyperthermia and transcatheter arteria chemoembolization in the treatment of the advanced patients with hepatocellular carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens