2008•T'u Jang T'ung PaoRequires access

Soil Physical Properties and Water Conservation Function of Model Plantations in South China

Wang Xiang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Soil physical properties and water holding capacities of litter and woodlands were studied under Cunninghamia lanceolata, Pinus massoniana, Pinus elliottii, Eucalyptus urophylla and Acacia mangium plantations in South China. The capillary porosities, non-capillary porosities and total porosities of upper soil layer in the five plantations were greater than those of lower soil layer, whereas the soil densities were lower than the latter. Generally, the soils under C. lanceolata and A. mangium woodlands were porous, whereas the soil under E. urophylla woodland was solid, and the P. massoniana and P. elliottii showed a median soil density. The order of total water holding capacity of litter was C. lanceolata plantation (18t hm-2) A. mangium plantation (15t hm-2)E. urophylla plantation (14t hm-2) P. massoniana plantation (11t hm-2) P. elliottii plantation (10t hm-2). Soil water holding amount accounted above 99% of that of the woodlands,with the order of C. lanceolata plantation and A. mangium plantation (2064 and 2061t hm-2) P. elliottii plantation (2041t hm-2) P. massoniana plantation (2032t hm-2) E. urophylla plantation (1941t hm-2). The order of water holding amount of the woodlands was C. lanceolata woodland (2082t hm-2)A. mangium woodland (2076t hm-2)P. elliottii woodland (2051t hm-2)P. massoniana woodland (2043t hm-2)E. urophylla woodland (1955t hm-2).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Soil physical properties and water holding capacities of litter and woodlands were studied under Cunninghamia lanceolata, Pinus massoniana, Pinus elliottii, Eucalyptus urophylla and Acacia mangium plantations in South China. The capillary porosities, non-capillary porosities and total porosities of upper soil layer in the five plantations were greater than those of lower soil layer, whereas the soil densities were lower than the latter. Generally, the soils under C. lanceolata and A. mangium woodlands were porous, whereas the soil under E. urophylla woodland was solid, and the P. massoniana and P. elliottii showed a median soil density. The order of total water holding capacity of litter was C. lanceolata plantation (18t hm-2) A. mangium plantation (15t hm-2)E. urophylla plantation (14t hm-2) P. massoniana plantation (11t hm-2) P. elliottii plantation (10t hm-2). Soil water holding amount accounted above 99% of that of the woodlands,with the order of C. lanceolata plantation and A. mangium plantation (2064 and 2061t hm-2) P. elliottii plantation (2041t hm-2) P. massoniana plantation (2032t hm-2) E. urophylla plantation (1941t hm-2). The order of water holding amount of the woodlands was C. lanceolata woodland (2082t hm-2)A. mangium woodland (2076t hm-2)P. elliottii woodland (2051t hm-2)P. massoniana woodland (2043t hm-2)E. urophylla woodland (1955t hm-2).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Soil physical properties and water holding capacities of litter and woodlands were studied under Cunninghamia lanceolata, Pinus massoniana, Pinus elliottii, Eucalyptus urophylla and Acacia mangium plantations in South China. The capillary porosities, non-capillary porosities and total porosities of upper soil layer in the five plantations were greater than those of lower soil layer, whereas the soil densities were lower than the latter. Generally, the soils under C. lanceolata and A. mangium woodlands were porous, whereas the soil under E. urophylla woodland was solid, and the P. massoniana and P. elliottii showed a median soil density. The order of total water holding capacity of litter was C. lanceolata plantation (18t hm-2) A. mangium plantation (15t hm-2)E. urophylla plantation (14t hm-2) P. massoniana plantation (11t hm-2) P. elliottii plantation (10t hm-2). Soil water holding amount accounted above 99% of that of the woodlands,with the order of C. lanceolata plantation and A. mangium plantation (2064 and 2061t hm-2) P. elliottii plantation (2041t hm-2) P. massoniana plantation (2032t hm-2) E. urophylla plantation (1941t hm-2). The order of water holding amount of the woodlands was C. lanceolata woodland (2082t hm-2)A. mangium woodland (2076t hm-2)P. elliottii woodland (2051t hm-2)P. massoniana woodland (2043t hm-2)E. urophylla woodland (1955t hm-2).

Key concepts: Pinus massoniana, Acacia mangium, Cunninghamia, Woodland, Litter, Soil water, Agroforestry, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Soil Physical Properties and Water Conservation Function of Model Plantations in South China — Research Paper | ScholarLens