2000•TumoriRequires access

COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF DIFFERENT IMAGING EXAMINATIONS FOR BREAST LUMPS

Yi Xin Zhou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography, mammography and MRI for breast lumps Methods 48 cases of breast lumps entered this study.The results of the ultrasonography, mammography and MRI were analyzed and correlated with their pathologic diagnoses. Results The rates of correct diagnosis of ultrasonography, mammography and MRI were 66.7%, 56.8% and 92.6%, respectively.B ultrasonography might miss those breast lumps1 0 cm diameter, and mammography might lead to miss diagnosis. For malignant lesions of 40 years patients, B ultrasonography gave a correct diagnosis in 100.0%, while for those 40 yrs. patients mammography was better than ultrasonopraphy.Conclusion Ultrasonography and mammography are still the commonly used methods to diagnose breast lumps because of their low costs and fairly accurate results. When difficulties are met with by using these two methods, MRI may give some helps.$$$$

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography, mammography and MRI for breast lumps Methods 48 cases of breast lumps entered this study.The results of the ultrasonography, mammography and MRI were analyzed and correlated with their pathologic diagnoses. Results The rates of correct diagnosis of ultrasonography, mammography and MRI were 66.7%, 56.8% and 92.6%, respectively.B ultrasonography might miss those breast lumps1 0 cm diameter, and mammography might lead to miss diagnosis. For malignant lesions of 40 years patients, B ultrasonography gave a correct diagnosis in 100.0%, while for those 40 yrs. patients mammography was better than ultrasonopraphy.Conclusion Ultrasonography and mammography are still the commonly used methods to diagnose breast lumps because of their low costs and fairly accurate results. When difficulties are met with by using these two methods, MRI may give some helps.$$$$

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography, mammography and MRI for breast lumps Methods 48 cases of breast lumps entered this study.The results of the ultrasonography, mammography and MRI were analyzed and correlated with their pathologic diagnoses. Results The rates of correct diagnosis of ultrasonography, mammography and MRI were 66.7%, 56.8% and 92.6%, respectively.B ultrasonography might miss those breast lumps1 0 cm diameter, and mammography might lead to miss diagnosis. For malignant lesions of 40 years patients, B ultrasonography gave a correct diagnosis in 100.0%, while for those 40 yrs. patients mammography was better than ultrasonopraphy.Conclusion Ultrasonography and mammography are still the commonly used methods to diagnose breast lumps because of their low costs and fairly accurate results. When difficulties are met with by using these two methods, MRI may give some helps.$$$$

Key concepts: Medicine, Mammography, Breast lumps, Ultrasonography, Radiology, Medical diagnosis, Breast cancer, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF DIFFERENT IMAGING EXAMINATIONS FOR BREAST LUMPS — Research Paper | ScholarLens