2003Di-Si Junyi Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block: A comparison of two methods of nerve localization nerve stimulation versus paresthesia

JI Gen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To compare the onset time and the success rate of a multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block performed by using two methods of nerve localization: paresthesia elicitation or nerve stimulation. METHODS: Each of the major nerves of the plexus was located by elicitation of a paresthesia (Group PAR; n = 48) or by nerve stimulation (Group PNS; n =48) and injected with 8 mL of local anesthetic solution. Time of blocking, onset, beginning of surgery and total anesthetic period was recorded respectively. RESULTS: The time recorded in Group PNS was significantly shorter than that in Group PAR (91% vs 76%; P 0.05) and the success rate for anesthetizing the radial and the musculocutaneous nerves in Group PNS was higher in Group PNS ( P 0.05). The rate of venous puncture was higher in Group PAR ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation is a better than paresthesia elicitation for axillary brachial plexus block.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To compare the onset time and the success rate of a multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block performed by using two methods of nerve localization: paresthesia elicitation or nerve stimulation. METHODS: Each of the major nerves of the plexus was located by elicitation of a paresthesia (Group PAR; n = 48) or by nerve stimulation (Group PNS; n =48) and injected with 8 mL of local anesthetic solution. Time of blocking, onset, beginning of surgery and total anesthetic period was recorded respectively. RESULTS: The time recorded in Group PNS was significantly shorter than that in Group PAR (91% vs 76%; P 0.05) and the success rate for anesthetizing the radial and the musculocutaneous nerves in Group PNS was higher in Group PNS ( P 0.05). The rate of venous puncture was higher in Group PAR ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation is a better than paresthesia elicitation for axillary brachial plexus block.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To compare the onset time and the success rate of a multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block performed by using two methods of nerve localization: paresthesia elicitation or nerve stimulation. METHODS: Each of the major nerves of the plexus was located by elicitation of a paresthesia (Group PAR; n = 48) or by nerve stimulation (Group PNS; n =48) and injected with 8 mL of local anesthetic solution. Time of blocking, onset, beginning of surgery and total anesthetic period was recorded respectively. RESULTS: The time recorded in Group PNS was significantly shorter than that in Group PAR (91% vs 76%; P 0.05) and the success rate for anesthetizing the radial and the musculocutaneous nerves in Group PNS was higher in Group PNS ( P 0.05). The rate of venous puncture was higher in Group PAR ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation is a better than paresthesia elicitation for axillary brachial plexus block.

Key concepts: Medicine, Brachial plexus, Anesthesia, Stimulation, Axillary nerve, Nerve block, Musculocutaneous nerve, Brachial plexus block

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block: A comparison of two methods of nerve localization nerve stimulation versus paresthesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens