Multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block: A comparison of two methods of nerve localization nerve stimulation versus paresthesia
JI Gen
Abstract
JI Gen
Abstract
AIM: To compare the onset time and the success rate of a multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block performed by using two methods of nerve localization: paresthesia elicitation or nerve stimulation. METHODS: Each of the major nerves of the plexus was located by elicitation of a paresthesia (Group PAR; n = 48) or by nerve stimulation (Group PNS; n =48) and injected with 8 mL of local anesthetic solution. Time of blocking, onset, beginning of surgery and total anesthetic period was recorded respectively. RESULTS: The time recorded in Group PNS was significantly shorter than that in Group PAR (91% vs 76%; P 0.05) and the success rate for anesthetizing the radial and the musculocutaneous nerves in Group PNS was higher in Group PNS ( P 0.05). The rate of venous puncture was higher in Group PAR ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation is a better than paresthesia elicitation for axillary brachial plexus block.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To compare the onset time and the success rate of a multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block performed by using two methods of nerve localization: paresthesia elicitation or nerve stimulation. METHODS: Each of the major nerves of the plexus was located by elicitation of a paresthesia (Group PAR; n = 48) or by nerve stimulation (Group PNS; n =48) and injected with 8 mL of local anesthetic solution. Time of blocking, onset, beginning of surgery and total anesthetic period was recorded respectively. RESULTS: The time recorded in Group PNS was significantly shorter than that in Group PAR (91% vs 76%; P 0.05) and the success rate for anesthetizing the radial and the musculocutaneous nerves in Group PNS was higher in Group PNS ( P 0.05). The rate of venous puncture was higher in Group PAR ( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation is a better than paresthesia elicitation for axillary brachial plexus block.
Key concepts: Medicine, Brachial plexus, Anesthesia, Stimulation, Axillary nerve, Nerve block, Musculocutaneous nerve, Brachial plexus block