2003Research and Practice on Chinese MedicinesRequires access

Comparison of Buccal Sustained-release Mucoadhesive Tablets and Mucoadhesive Films

Zhou DongXin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare buccal susutained-release mucoadhesive tablets and mucoadhesive films.Methods The qualities of the mucoadhesive tablets and mucoadhesive films were tested and the clinical curative effects of them were observed and compared.Results The adhesive force, dissolution, buccal adhesive test and the clinical curative effect of the tablets were better than those of the films. After absorbing water and swelling ,the tablets can be adhered to the wound of ulcer and can not be easily moved. The tablets can make the curative effects as well as protect the wound and the curative effects can be longer.Conclusion The function of the susutained-release mucoadhesive tablets is better than that of films. The curative effect is remarkable. However, the preparation of tablets is complex and the preparation of films is simple.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare buccal susutained-release mucoadhesive tablets and mucoadhesive films.Methods The qualities of the mucoadhesive tablets and mucoadhesive films were tested and the clinical curative effects of them were observed and compared.Results The adhesive force, dissolution, buccal adhesive test and the clinical curative effect of the tablets were better than those of the films. After absorbing water and swelling ,the tablets can be adhered to the wound of ulcer and can not be easily moved. The tablets can make the curative effects as well as protect the wound and the curative effects can be longer.Conclusion The function of the susutained-release mucoadhesive tablets is better than that of films. The curative effect is remarkable. However, the preparation of tablets is complex and the preparation of films is simple.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare buccal susutained-release mucoadhesive tablets and mucoadhesive films.Methods The qualities of the mucoadhesive tablets and mucoadhesive films were tested and the clinical curative effects of them were observed and compared.Results The adhesive force, dissolution, buccal adhesive test and the clinical curative effect of the tablets were better than those of the films. After absorbing water and swelling ,the tablets can be adhered to the wound of ulcer and can not be easily moved. The tablets can make the curative effects as well as protect the wound and the curative effects can be longer.Conclusion The function of the susutained-release mucoadhesive tablets is better than that of films. The curative effect is remarkable. However, the preparation of tablets is complex and the preparation of films is simple.

Key concepts: Buccal administration, Adhesive, Swelling, Mucoadhesion, Materials science, Dentistry, Medicine, Drug delivery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Buccal Sustained-release Mucoadhesive Tablets and Mucoadhesive Films — Research Paper | ScholarLens