2012China Modern DoctorRequires access

Comparison of the efficacy of vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of non-prolapsed uterus

Weiling Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of non-prolapsed uterus.Methods 66 cases of patients with non-prolapsed uterus lesions were used vaginal hysterectomy(vaginal group,32 patients) or abdominal hysterectomy(abdominal group,34 patients) treatment.Results Both groups of patients were operated successfully,The time,blood loss,postoperative analgesic rate,postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative hospital stay of vaginal surgery group were significantly less than those of the abdominal group(P 0.05 or P 0.01).Postoperative vaginal pelvic hematoma occurred in 1 case in vaginal group,and there was 1 case with intraoperative ureteral injury in abdominal group and 2 cases with postoperative wound infection and fat liquefaction.Intraoperative and postoperative complications in both groups showed no significant difference(P 0.05).During the follow up for 3 months to 22 months with the average(13.1 ± 2.7) months,the vaginal stump healed well and found no granulation tissue and vaginal stump prolapse.Conclusion Vaginal hysterectomy has the advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss,lower postoperative analgesic rate,earlier postoperative flatus,shorter hospital stay,without postoperative abdominal scar and fewer complications.It is the first choice for the treatment non-prolapsed uterus.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy of vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of non-prolapsed uterus.Methods 66 cases of patients with non-prolapsed uterus lesions were used vaginal hysterectomy(vaginal group,32 patients) or abdominal hysterectomy(abdominal group,34 patients) treatment.Results Both groups of patients were operated successfully,The time,blood loss,postoperative analgesic rate,postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative hospital stay of vaginal surgery group were significantly less than those of the abdominal group(P 0.05 or P 0.01).Postoperative vaginal pelvic hematoma occurred in 1 case in vaginal group,and there was 1 case with intraoperative ureteral injury in abdominal group and 2 cases with postoperative wound infection and fat liquefaction.Intraoperative and postoperative complications in both groups showed no significant difference(P 0.05).During the follow up for 3 months to 22 months with the average(13.1 ± 2.7) months,the vaginal stump healed well and found no granulation tissue and vaginal stump prolapse.Conclusion Vaginal hysterectomy has the advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss,lower postoperative analgesic rate,earlier postoperative flatus,shorter hospital stay,without postoperative abdominal scar and fewer complications.It is the first choice for the treatment non-prolapsed uterus.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of non-prolapsed uterus.Methods 66 cases of patients with non-prolapsed uterus lesions were used vaginal hysterectomy(vaginal group,32 patients) or abdominal hysterectomy(abdominal group,34 patients) treatment.Results Both groups of patients were operated successfully,The time,blood loss,postoperative analgesic rate,postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative hospital stay of vaginal surgery group were significantly less than those of the abdominal group(P 0.05 or P 0.01).Postoperative vaginal pelvic hematoma occurred in 1 case in vaginal group,and there was 1 case with intraoperative ureteral injury in abdominal group and 2 cases with postoperative wound infection and fat liquefaction.Intraoperative and postoperative complications in both groups showed no significant difference(P 0.05).During the follow up for 3 months to 22 months with the average(13.1 ± 2.7) months,the vaginal stump healed well and found no granulation tissue and vaginal stump prolapse.Conclusion Vaginal hysterectomy has the advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss,lower postoperative analgesic rate,earlier postoperative flatus,shorter hospital stay,without postoperative abdominal scar and fewer complications.It is the first choice for the treatment non-prolapsed uterus.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Uterus, Hysterectomy, Analgesic, Blood loss, Anesthesia, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the efficacy of vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of non-prolapsed uterus — Research Paper | ScholarLens