2003Journal of the Graduates Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRequires access

Radical Feminist Jurisprudence: Another Angle Considering Law

Lei Guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The viewpoint that juristical grand theory establishers regarding law as rational, and the social convention treating the male as the radical spokesman, in the idea of the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence which is a part of the Postmodern Jurisprudence, in fact support the male discrimination plot. Therefore legal theory becomes the word oppressing female. This opinion overthrows the legal universal rule and denies the existence of the radical individual as automatic legal main body. It sets challense to the legal neutral principle, and makes the legal investigators survey the law from a different angle. But the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence by way of Postmodern Jurisprudence as sustain and edification has many problems in its own theory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The viewpoint that juristical grand theory establishers regarding law as rational, and the social convention treating the male as the radical spokesman, in the idea of the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence which is a part of the Postmodern Jurisprudence, in fact support the male discrimination plot. Therefore legal theory becomes the word oppressing female. This opinion overthrows the legal universal rule and denies the existence of the radical individual as automatic legal main body. It sets challense to the legal neutral principle, and makes the legal investigators survey the law from a different angle. But the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence by way of Postmodern Jurisprudence as sustain and edification has many problems in its own theory.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The viewpoint that juristical grand theory establishers regarding law as rational, and the social convention treating the male as the radical spokesman, in the idea of the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence which is a part of the Postmodern Jurisprudence, in fact support the male discrimination plot. Therefore legal theory becomes the word oppressing female. This opinion overthrows the legal universal rule and denies the existence of the radical individual as automatic legal main body. It sets challense to the legal neutral principle, and makes the legal investigators survey the law from a different angle. But the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence by way of Postmodern Jurisprudence as sustain and edification has many problems in its own theory.

Key concepts: Jurisprudence, Postmodernism, Law, Philosophy of law, Sociology, Political science, Philosophy, Comparative law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radical Feminist Jurisprudence: Another Angle Considering Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens