[Comparison of efficacy between nateglinide and repaglinide in treating type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial].
Jianwei Li, Haoming Tian, Honglin Yu, Xiang-xun Zhang, Guizhi Zhao, Jia-nan Wang
Abstract
Jianwei Li, Haoming Tian, Honglin Yu, Xiang-xun Zhang, Guizhi Zhao, Jia-nan Wang
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of nateglinide with repaglinide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Forty-six type 2 diabetic patients were randomly treated with repaglinide (group A, 1.0 mg tid, n=23) or nateglinide (group B, 90.0 mg tid, n=23). The trial consisted of a 4-week equilibrated period followed by 12 weeks of treatment course. RESULTS: In group A, the fasting blood glucose (FBG) and 30-, 60-, 120- min postprandial blood glucose (PBG), as well as hemoglobin A1c were decreased significantly (P<0.05). In group B, the 60-min and 120-min PBG decreased remarkably (P<0.05), but FBG, 30-min PBG and A1c decreased with no statistical significance (P>0.05). After 12 weeks treatment, the 30-, 60-, 120-min postprandial insulin level, area under the curve of insulin and C peptide (0 to 120 min) increased in both groups (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the effects of repaglinide and nateglinide on early phase insulin secretion. CONCLUSION: The glucose lowering effect of repaglinide at a dosing level of 1.0 mg tid was better than that of nateglinide 90 mg tid on fasting blood glucose and A1c during 12 weeks treatment period, yet the insulinotropic effects of the two drugs were similar.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of nateglinide with repaglinide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Forty-six type 2 diabetic patients were randomly treated with repaglinide (group A, 1.0 mg tid, n=23) or nateglinide (group B, 90.0 mg tid, n=23). The trial consisted of a 4-week equilibrated period followed by 12 weeks of treatment course. RESULTS: In group A, the fasting blood glucose (FBG) and 30-, 60-, 120- min postprandial blood glucose (PBG), as well as hemoglobin A1c were decreased significantly (P<0.05). In group B, the 60-min and 120-min PBG decreased remarkably (P<0.05), but FBG, 30-min PBG and A1c decreased with no statistical significance (P>0.05). After 12 weeks treatment, the 30-, 60-, 120-min postprandial insulin level, area under the curve of insulin and C peptide (0 to 120 min) increased in both groups (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the effects of repaglinide and nateglinide on early phase insulin secretion. CONCLUSION: The glucose lowering effect of repaglinide at a dosing level of 1.0 mg tid was better than that of nateglinide 90 mg tid on fasting blood glucose and A1c during 12 weeks treatment period, yet the insulinotropic effects of the two drugs were similar.
Key concepts: Nateglinide, Repaglinide, Postprandial, Medicine, Internal medicine, Insulin, Type 2 diabetes, Endocrinology