2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Arbitrariness of Signs Revisited

Wang Jiayue

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Recent publications in China have over-emphasized iconicity of linguistic signs while depreciating Saussurean arbitrariness.Arbitrariness,which can actually be very well integrated with findings of contemporary cognitive linguistic research,is here argued to be an elementary feature of signs,theoretically significant within semiotics.The arbitrariness of linguistic signs is part of the evidence of semiotic arbitrariness.Basic linguistic signs are arbitrary,while language motivation dwells in the rule system.The signified,or concept,varies with the cognitive pattern,and the signifier,i.e.linguistic sign,shows even greater variation.Iconicity is a good supplement to,instead of replacement of,the arbitrariness theory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent publications in China have over-emphasized iconicity of linguistic signs while depreciating Saussurean arbitrariness.Arbitrariness,which can actually be very well integrated with findings of contemporary cognitive linguistic research,is here argued to be an elementary feature of signs,theoretically significant within semiotics.The arbitrariness of linguistic signs is part of the evidence of semiotic arbitrariness.Basic linguistic signs are arbitrary,while language motivation dwells in the rule system.The signified,or concept,varies with the cognitive pattern,and the signifier,i.e.linguistic sign,shows even greater variation.Iconicity is a good supplement to,instead of replacement of,the arbitrariness theory.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent publications in China have over-emphasized iconicity of linguistic signs while depreciating Saussurean arbitrariness.Arbitrariness,which can actually be very well integrated with findings of contemporary cognitive linguistic research,is here argued to be an elementary feature of signs,theoretically significant within semiotics.The arbitrariness of linguistic signs is part of the evidence of semiotic arbitrariness.Basic linguistic signs are arbitrary,while language motivation dwells in the rule system.The signified,or concept,varies with the cognitive pattern,and the signifier,i.e.linguistic sign,shows even greater variation.Iconicity is a good supplement to,instead of replacement of,the arbitrariness theory.

Key concepts: Arbitrariness, Iconicity, Semiotics, Sign (mathematics), Linguistics, Epistemology, Philosophy, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Arbitrariness of Signs Revisited — Research Paper | ScholarLens