Reflect on People's Juror System and its Possible Trajectory
Zhang Pu-tian
Abstract
Zhang Pu-tian
Abstract
The current people's juror system was given an anticipation of judicial democracy,but practice proves that the value given by the law has not fully reflected;and there exists many inconsistencies within the current system itself and the present lawsuit practice and the legal provisions.Therefore,the people's juror system should be reviewed and reformed under the existing social background: combine experts jury with public jury,perfect the selection and management of people's jurors,and define the rights,obligations and responsibilities of the jurors.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The current people's juror system was given an anticipation of judicial democracy,but practice proves that the value given by the law has not fully reflected;and there exists many inconsistencies within the current system itself and the present lawsuit practice and the legal provisions.Therefore,the people's juror system should be reviewed and reformed under the existing social background: combine experts jury with public jury,perfect the selection and management of people's jurors,and define the rights,obligations and responsibilities of the jurors.
Key concepts: Jury, Anticipation (artificial intelligence), Lawsuit, Jury selection, Democracy, Value (mathematics), Verdict, Law