2004The Chinese Journal of Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

Double-blind double-dummy randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial of domestic cilnidipine on treatment of essential hypertension

Yao Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Evaluate the antihypertensive effects and safety of domestic cilnidipine. Methods The antihypertensive effects and safety of cilnidipine were compared with amlodipine in double-blind double-dummy randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial in 233 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Results After 8 weeks of therapy, mean sitting systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were reduced by 16.2 and 12.7 mmHg, in cilnidipine 23.1 and 15.1 mmHg in amlodipine, respectively. The results showed that there was significant difference in the efficiency between cilnidipine and amlodipine (76.6% vs 87.7% ).The change of heart rates was not significant both of them. The rate of adverse effects were 16.7% in cilnidipine and 12.9% in amlodipine. The antihypertensive effects of cilnidipine could persist for long time. Conclusion Cilnidipine was effective and relatively safe for mild to moderate essential hypertension.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Evaluate the antihypertensive effects and safety of domestic cilnidipine. Methods The antihypertensive effects and safety of cilnidipine were compared with amlodipine in double-blind double-dummy randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial in 233 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Results After 8 weeks of therapy, mean sitting systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were reduced by 16.2 and 12.7 mmHg, in cilnidipine 23.1 and 15.1 mmHg in amlodipine, respectively. The results showed that there was significant difference in the efficiency between cilnidipine and amlodipine (76.6% vs 87.7% ).The change of heart rates was not significant both of them. The rate of adverse effects were 16.7% in cilnidipine and 12.9% in amlodipine. The antihypertensive effects of cilnidipine could persist for long time. Conclusion Cilnidipine was effective and relatively safe for mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Evaluate the antihypertensive effects and safety of domestic cilnidipine. Methods The antihypertensive effects and safety of cilnidipine were compared with amlodipine in double-blind double-dummy randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial in 233 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Results After 8 weeks of therapy, mean sitting systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were reduced by 16.2 and 12.7 mmHg, in cilnidipine 23.1 and 15.1 mmHg in amlodipine, respectively. The results showed that there was significant difference in the efficiency between cilnidipine and amlodipine (76.6% vs 87.7% ).The change of heart rates was not significant both of them. The rate of adverse effects were 16.7% in cilnidipine and 12.9% in amlodipine. The antihypertensive effects of cilnidipine could persist for long time. Conclusion Cilnidipine was effective and relatively safe for mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Key concepts: Amlodipine, Medicine, Essential hypertension, Blood pressure, Double blind, Randomized controlled trial, Adverse effect, Clinical trial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Double-blind double-dummy randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial of domestic cilnidipine on treatment of essential hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens