2004•Journal of Southwest Jiaotong UniversityRequires access

Discussion of Traffic Accident Liability: Economic Analysis

Feng Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The newly issued Road Traffic Safety Law will take effect on May 1, 2004. Reflecting the human-centered concept, article 76 stipulates that motorists should be held responsible for any traffic accident with pedestrians, even if they are not at fault. Through a legal-economic analysis of the rule for the determination of traffic accident liability, the thesis demonstrates that the both pedestrians' right and motorists' right should be taken care of. In addition, this paper maintains that it is the negligence liability rule, not the strict liability rule that can make the social welfare maximum.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The newly issued Road Traffic Safety Law will take effect on May 1, 2004. Reflecting the human-centered concept, article 76 stipulates that motorists should be held responsible for any traffic accident with pedestrians, even if they are not at fault. Through a legal-economic analysis of the rule for the determination of traffic accident liability, the thesis demonstrates that the both pedestrians' right and motorists' right should be taken care of. In addition, this paper maintains that it is the negligence liability rule, not the strict liability rule that can make the social welfare maximum.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The newly issued Road Traffic Safety Law will take effect on May 1, 2004. Reflecting the human-centered concept, article 76 stipulates that motorists should be held responsible for any traffic accident with pedestrians, even if they are not at fault. Through a legal-economic analysis of the rule for the determination of traffic accident liability, the thesis demonstrates that the both pedestrians' right and motorists' right should be taken care of. In addition, this paper maintains that it is the negligence liability rule, not the strict liability rule that can make the social welfare maximum.

Key concepts: Liability, Accident (philosophy), Traffic accident, Business, Transport engineering, Strict liability, Actuarial science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discussion of Traffic Accident Liability: Economic Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens