2011Linchuang huicuiRequires access

Clinical analysis of diabetic nephropathy by rhubarb-based medicine enema.

Jun Guo, Liming Chen, Chang Bao-cheng, Miaoyan Zheng, Wen JuanJuan, Hongxi Sun

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the clinical effect of type 2 diabetic patients with renal insufficiency by rhubarb-based medicine enema and analyze the related factors affecting the therapeutic effect. Methods 140 type 2 diabetic patients with both type 2 diabetic nephropathy and chronic renal insufficiency were randomly divided into four groups,conventional treatment group(32 cases):conventional oral drug treatment,rhubarb enema group 1(38 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema two times per day,rhubarb enema group 2(33 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema once per day,mixed enema group(37 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema once per day and an enema of medicinal carbon tablets per day. Results The total effective rate of rhubarb enema group 1,mixed enema group,rhubarb enema group 2 was 84.2%,78.4%,66.6%,respectively,the total effect of rhubarb enema group 1 was significantly greater than the conventional treatment group(P0.05).After treatment,BUN in rhubarb enema group 1 and mixed enema group were lower than that in conventional treatment group,rhubarb enema group 1(8.54±3.02) mmol/L vs mixed enema group(9.04±2.77) mmol/L vs conventional treatment group(10.85±3.79) mmol/L,respectively;24 urine total protein was lower in rhubarb enema group 1,mixed enema group and rhubarb enema group 2 than that in conventional treatment group,rhubarb enema 1 and mixed enema group less than rhubarb enema 2,rhubarb enema group1(1.66±0.46) g vs mixed enema group(1.81±0.43) g vs rhubarb enema group 2(2.05±0.53) g vs conventional treatment group(2.35±0.57) g.Glomerular filtration rate which in rhubard enema group 1 and mixed enema group more than rhubarb enema group 2,rhubard enema group 1(45.83±8.43) ml/min vs mixed enema group(39.68±7.95) ml/min vs rhubarb enema group 2(37.53±7.85) ml/min vs conventional treatment group(35.23±8.82) ml/min,respectively(P0.01).Multivariate non-conditional logistic regression analysis indicated that the main factors influencing efficacy included age,disease duration,systolic blood pressure,GFR.OR values were 0.890,0.857,0.961,1.054,respectively(P0.05). Conclusion Conventional treatment plus rhubarb enema can not only reduce SCr,BUN,UTP significantly,improve renal function,but also can delay the progress of chronic renal function and improve long-term prognosis of patients with diabetic nephropathy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the clinical effect of type 2 diabetic patients with renal insufficiency by rhubarb-based medicine enema and analyze the related factors affecting the therapeutic effect. Methods 140 type 2 diabetic patients with both type 2 diabetic nephropathy and chronic renal insufficiency were randomly divided into four groups,conventional treatment group(32 cases):conventional oral drug treatment,rhubarb enema group 1(38 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema two times per day,rhubarb enema group 2(33 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema once per day,mixed enema group(37 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema once per day and an enema of medicinal carbon tablets per day. Results The total effective rate of rhubarb enema group 1,mixed enema group,rhubarb enema group 2 was 84.2%,78.4%,66.6%,respectively,the total effect of rhubarb enema group 1 was significantly greater than the conventional treatment group(P0.05).After treatment,BUN in rhubarb enema group 1 and mixed enema group were lower than that in conventional treatment group,rhubarb enema group 1(8.54±3.02) mmol/L vs mixed enema group(9.04±2.77) mmol/L vs conventional treatment group(10.85±3.79) mmol/L,respectively;24 urine total protein was lower in rhubarb enema group 1,mixed enema group and rhubarb enema group 2 than that in conventional treatment group,rhubarb enema 1 and mixed enema group less than rhubarb enema 2,rhubarb enema group1(1.66±0.46) g vs mixed enema group(1.81±0.43) g vs rhubarb enema group 2(2.05±0.53) g vs conventional treatment group(2.35±0.57) g.Glomerular filtration rate which in rhubard enema group 1 and mixed enema group more than rhubarb enema group 2,rhubard enema group 1(45.83±8.43) ml/min vs mixed enema group(39.68±7.95) ml/min vs rhubarb enema group 2(37.53±7.85) ml/min vs conventional treatment group(35.23±8.82) ml/min,respectively(P0.01).Multivariate non-conditional logistic regression analysis indicated that the main factors influencing efficacy included age,disease duration,systolic blood pressure,GFR.OR values were 0.890,0.857,0.961,1.054,respectively(P0.05). Conclusion Conventional treatment plus rhubarb enema can not only reduce SCr,BUN,UTP significantly,improve renal function,but also can delay the progress of chronic renal function and improve long-term prognosis of patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the clinical effect of type 2 diabetic patients with renal insufficiency by rhubarb-based medicine enema and analyze the related factors affecting the therapeutic effect. Methods 140 type 2 diabetic patients with both type 2 diabetic nephropathy and chronic renal insufficiency were randomly divided into four groups,conventional treatment group(32 cases):conventional oral drug treatment,rhubarb enema group 1(38 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema two times per day,rhubarb enema group 2(33 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema once per day,mixed enema group(37 cases):conventional therapy plus rhubarb enema once per day and an enema of medicinal carbon tablets per day. Results The total effective rate of rhubarb enema group 1,mixed enema group,rhubarb enema group 2 was 84.2%,78.4%,66.6%,respectively,the total effect of rhubarb enema group 1 was significantly greater than the conventional treatment group(P0.05).After treatment,BUN in rhubarb enema group 1 and mixed enema group were lower than that in conventional treatment group,rhubarb enema group 1(8.54±3.02) mmol/L vs mixed enema group(9.04±2.77) mmol/L vs conventional treatment group(10.85±3.79) mmol/L,respectively;24 urine total protein was lower in rhubarb enema group 1,mixed enema group and rhubarb enema group 2 than that in conventional treatment group,rhubarb enema 1 and mixed enema group less than rhubarb enema 2,rhubarb enema group1(1.66±0.46) g vs mixed enema group(1.81±0.43) g vs rhubarb enema group 2(2.05±0.53) g vs conventional treatment group(2.35±0.57) g.Glomerular filtration rate which in rhubard enema group 1 and mixed enema group more than rhubarb enema group 2,rhubard enema group 1(45.83±8.43) ml/min vs mixed enema group(39.68±7.95) ml/min vs rhubarb enema group 2(37.53±7.85) ml/min vs conventional treatment group(35.23±8.82) ml/min,respectively(P0.01).Multivariate non-conditional logistic regression analysis indicated that the main factors influencing efficacy included age,disease duration,systolic blood pressure,GFR.OR values were 0.890,0.857,0.961,1.054,respectively(P0.05). Conclusion Conventional treatment plus rhubarb enema can not only reduce SCr,BUN,UTP significantly,improve renal function,but also can delay the progress of chronic renal function and improve long-term prognosis of patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Key concepts: Enema, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical analysis of diabetic nephropathy by rhubarb-based medicine enema. — Research Paper | ScholarLens