2010•Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory TechnologyRequires access

Clinical evaluation and diagnostic value of six serum tumor markers in detection of lung cancer

Fan Fan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluation the clinical application value of multiple tumor markers(including CY21-1,NSE,CEA,CA125,CA199,SCC) in the diagnosis of different pathologic type and stages of lung cancer(except for stage Ⅳ lung cancer).Methods:The level of Six serum tumor markers was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA) in 266 patients with different pathologic type and stages of lung cancer.Results:For squamous cell carcinoma,the positive rate(53.4%) of SCC was higher than other serum tumor markers,the positive rate of SCC in stage II and stage III group was significantly higher than this in stage I group(P0.05).For adenocarcinoma,the positive rate(41.0%) of CEA was higher than other serum tumor markers,and there was no significantly difference in different clinical stages;the positive rate of CY21-1 in squamous cell carcinoma was higher than this in adenocarcinoma(P0.05),but positive rate is lower than previous report.The auxiliary diagnosis value of NSE in neuroendocrine carcinoma was not correspondent with expectation.Conclusion:The sensitivity and accuracy can be efficiently improved with combination of SCC,CEA,CA125 and CA199.For detection of clinical case,doctors could choose the adaptive combination of the tumor markers according to different pathologic type of patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluation the clinical application value of multiple tumor markers(including CY21-1,NSE,CEA,CA125,CA199,SCC) in the diagnosis of different pathologic type and stages of lung cancer(except for stage Ⅳ lung cancer).Methods:The level of Six serum tumor markers was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA) in 266 patients with different pathologic type and stages of lung cancer.Results:For squamous cell carcinoma,the positive rate(53.4%) of SCC was higher than other serum tumor markers,the positive rate of SCC in stage II and stage III group was significantly higher than this in stage I group(P0.05).For adenocarcinoma,the positive rate(41.0%) of CEA was higher than other serum tumor markers,and there was no significantly difference in different clinical stages;the positive rate of CY21-1 in squamous cell carcinoma was higher than this in adenocarcinoma(P0.05),but positive rate is lower than previous report.The auxiliary diagnosis value of NSE in neuroendocrine carcinoma was not correspondent with expectation.Conclusion:The sensitivity and accuracy can be efficiently improved with combination of SCC,CEA,CA125 and CA199.For detection of clinical case,doctors could choose the adaptive combination of the tumor markers according to different pathologic type of patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluation the clinical application value of multiple tumor markers(including CY21-1,NSE,CEA,CA125,CA199,SCC) in the diagnosis of different pathologic type and stages of lung cancer(except for stage Ⅳ lung cancer).Methods:The level of Six serum tumor markers was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA) in 266 patients with different pathologic type and stages of lung cancer.Results:For squamous cell carcinoma,the positive rate(53.4%) of SCC was higher than other serum tumor markers,the positive rate of SCC in stage II and stage III group was significantly higher than this in stage I group(P0.05).For adenocarcinoma,the positive rate(41.0%) of CEA was higher than other serum tumor markers,and there was no significantly difference in different clinical stages;the positive rate of CY21-1 in squamous cell carcinoma was higher than this in adenocarcinoma(P0.05),but positive rate is lower than previous report.The auxiliary diagnosis value of NSE in neuroendocrine carcinoma was not correspondent with expectation.Conclusion:The sensitivity and accuracy can be efficiently improved with combination of SCC,CEA,CA125 and CA199.For detection of clinical case,doctors could choose the adaptive combination of the tumor markers according to different pathologic type of patients.

Key concepts: Lung cancer, Medicine, Internal medicine, Adenocarcinoma, Stage (stratigraphy), Tumor marker, Cancer, Oncology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation and diagnostic value of six serum tumor markers in detection of lung cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens