A Study on the Status of the Subject of Corruption and Its Accomplice
Deng Duo-wen
Abstract
Deng Duo-wen
Abstract
In this paper, the author thinks that the corruption is a standard status crime. This paper initiates analysis of the characteristic of the crime's status, and then makes an attempt to resolve the conviction of the subjects who have the status of state personnel and of employee in the enterprise respectively when they embezzle the property of the enterprise. There are such four theories as the theory of principal offender determination, of respective conviction, of principal object determination and of both corruptions. On the basis of these theories, the author, by understanding the constitution of the crime and joint crime, thinks that the core of conviction lies in whose status is utilized. If they take vantage of each other's status, joinder of punishment for plural crimes or imaginative joinder of offenses should be taken into consideration.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper, the author thinks that the corruption is a standard status crime. This paper initiates analysis of the characteristic of the crime's status, and then makes an attempt to resolve the conviction of the subjects who have the status of state personnel and of employee in the enterprise respectively when they embezzle the property of the enterprise. There are such four theories as the theory of principal offender determination, of respective conviction, of principal object determination and of both corruptions. On the basis of these theories, the author, by understanding the constitution of the crime and joint crime, thinks that the core of conviction lies in whose status is utilized. If they take vantage of each other's status, joinder of punishment for plural crimes or imaginative joinder of offenses should be taken into consideration.
Key concepts: Conviction, Principal (computer security), Subject (documents), Punishment (psychology), Constitution, Criminology, Language change, Law