2009Journal of Sichuan University of Science & EngineeringRequires access

On Accomplice and Status in the Criminal Law

Sang Ci-you

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There is no specific definition of status in the general provision of the Criminal Law. There is no consensus on it. However, the relationship between accomplice and status makes things more complicated. By interpreting the concept of accomplice and status, this paper analyzes the essence of status criminal. On the problem of accomplices and status, the theory of violating legal interests should be adopted in conviction. To resolve the status and non-status joint crime, the behavior theory should be the main standard of measurement, and the principle of interest measurement, the secondary. When the status helps or abets the non-status to commit a standard status offense, the fact that the general provision of the Criminal Law of our country treats status as a specific element of crime should be paid attention to. The status should be treated as an indirect principal offender; the non-status, an innocent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is no specific definition of status in the general provision of the Criminal Law. There is no consensus on it. However, the relationship between accomplice and status makes things more complicated. By interpreting the concept of accomplice and status, this paper analyzes the essence of status criminal. On the problem of accomplices and status, the theory of violating legal interests should be adopted in conviction. To resolve the status and non-status joint crime, the behavior theory should be the main standard of measurement, and the principle of interest measurement, the secondary. When the status helps or abets the non-status to commit a standard status offense, the fact that the general provision of the Criminal Law of our country treats status as a specific element of crime should be paid attention to. The status should be treated as an indirect principal offender; the non-status, an innocent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is no specific definition of status in the general provision of the Criminal Law. There is no consensus on it. However, the relationship between accomplice and status makes things more complicated. By interpreting the concept of accomplice and status, this paper analyzes the essence of status criminal. On the problem of accomplices and status, the theory of violating legal interests should be adopted in conviction. To resolve the status and non-status joint crime, the behavior theory should be the main standard of measurement, and the principle of interest measurement, the secondary. When the status helps or abets the non-status to commit a standard status offense, the fact that the general provision of the Criminal Law of our country treats status as a specific element of crime should be paid attention to. The status should be treated as an indirect principal offender; the non-status, an innocent.

Key concepts: Conviction, Legal status, Commit, Element (criminal law), Principal (computer security), Criminal law, Law, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Accomplice and Status in the Criminal Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens