2005•Chinese New Drugs JournalRequires access

A comparative clinical study for venlafaxine versus fluxetine in the treatment of depression

Tian Yin-lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression. Methods: 102 patients with depression were randomly administered with venlafaxine (n=51,48 completed) or fluoxetine (n=51,49 completed) for 6 weeks. The initial doses of venlafaxine versus fluoxetine were 50mg versus 20mg daily, and tapered up to 75~200mg versus 40mg daily in 7~10 days. The efficacy was evaluated with HAMD and CGI-SI. The safety profiles were assessed with TESS. Results: The overall efficacy of two treatment groups showed no significant difference (83.3% versus 81.2%,P0.05). The median response for venlafaxine treatment was on the (6.7±3.3) day and for fluoxetine on the (10.2±4.7) day (P0.05). Patients treated with venlafaxine experienced the improvement of depression symptoms in the scores of HAMD and CGI-SI as well as TESS at the end of the study compared to patients treated with fluoxetine, which was not significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Venlafaxine is a new option for the patients with depression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression. Methods: 102 patients with depression were randomly administered with venlafaxine (n=51,48 completed) or fluoxetine (n=51,49 completed) for 6 weeks. The initial doses of venlafaxine versus fluoxetine were 50mg versus 20mg daily, and tapered up to 75~200mg versus 40mg daily in 7~10 days. The efficacy was evaluated with HAMD and CGI-SI. The safety profiles were assessed with TESS. Results: The overall efficacy of two treatment groups showed no significant difference (83.3% versus 81.2%,P0.05). The median response for venlafaxine treatment was on the (6.7±3.3) day and for fluoxetine on the (10.2±4.7) day (P0.05). Patients treated with venlafaxine experienced the improvement of depression symptoms in the scores of HAMD and CGI-SI as well as TESS at the end of the study compared to patients treated with fluoxetine, which was not significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Venlafaxine is a new option for the patients with depression.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression. Methods: 102 patients with depression were randomly administered with venlafaxine (n=51,48 completed) or fluoxetine (n=51,49 completed) for 6 weeks. The initial doses of venlafaxine versus fluoxetine were 50mg versus 20mg daily, and tapered up to 75~200mg versus 40mg daily in 7~10 days. The efficacy was evaluated with HAMD and CGI-SI. The safety profiles were assessed with TESS. Results: The overall efficacy of two treatment groups showed no significant difference (83.3% versus 81.2%,P0.05). The median response for venlafaxine treatment was on the (6.7±3.3) day and for fluoxetine on the (10.2±4.7) day (P0.05). Patients treated with venlafaxine experienced the improvement of depression symptoms in the scores of HAMD and CGI-SI as well as TESS at the end of the study compared to patients treated with fluoxetine, which was not significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Venlafaxine is a new option for the patients with depression.

Key concepts: Venlafaxine, Hamd, Fluoxetine, Depression (economics), Medicine, Internal medicine, Significant difference, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative clinical study for venlafaxine versus fluxetine in the treatment of depression — Research Paper | ScholarLens