A comparative clinical study for venlafaxine versus fluxetine in the treatment of depression
Tian Yin-lin
Abstract
Tian Yin-lin
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression. Methods: 102 patients with depression were randomly administered with venlafaxine (n=51,48 completed) or fluoxetine (n=51,49 completed) for 6 weeks. The initial doses of venlafaxine versus fluoxetine were 50mg versus 20mg daily, and tapered up to 75~200mg versus 40mg daily in 7~10 days. The efficacy was evaluated with HAMD and CGI-SI. The safety profiles were assessed with TESS. Results: The overall efficacy of two treatment groups showed no significant difference (83.3% versus 81.2%,P0.05). The median response for venlafaxine treatment was on the (6.7±3.3) day and for fluoxetine on the (10.2±4.7) day (P0.05). Patients treated with venlafaxine experienced the improvement of depression symptoms in the scores of HAMD and CGI-SI as well as TESS at the end of the study compared to patients treated with fluoxetine, which was not significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Venlafaxine is a new option for the patients with depression.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression. Methods: 102 patients with depression were randomly administered with venlafaxine (n=51,48 completed) or fluoxetine (n=51,49 completed) for 6 weeks. The initial doses of venlafaxine versus fluoxetine were 50mg versus 20mg daily, and tapered up to 75~200mg versus 40mg daily in 7~10 days. The efficacy was evaluated with HAMD and CGI-SI. The safety profiles were assessed with TESS. Results: The overall efficacy of two treatment groups showed no significant difference (83.3% versus 81.2%,P0.05). The median response for venlafaxine treatment was on the (6.7±3.3) day and for fluoxetine on the (10.2±4.7) day (P0.05). Patients treated with venlafaxine experienced the improvement of depression symptoms in the scores of HAMD and CGI-SI as well as TESS at the end of the study compared to patients treated with fluoxetine, which was not significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Venlafaxine is a new option for the patients with depression.
Key concepts: Venlafaxine, Hamd, Fluoxetine, Depression (economics), Medicine, Internal medicine, Significant difference, Anesthesia