The controlled study on venlafaxine and fluoxetine in depression
Wei Sheng-zhong
Abstract
Wei Sheng-zhong
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression. Methods 120 patients with depression were randomly administered with venfalaxine (n=60, 57 completed) or fluoxetine (n=60, 58 completed) for 6 weeks. The initial doses of venlafazxine versus fluoxetine were 50mg versus 20 mg daily, and increased gradually to 75~225mg versus 40mg daily in day 7~10. The efficacy was evaluated with HAMD and CGI-SI. The safety profiles were assessed with TESS. Results The overall efficacy of two treatment groups showed no significant difference (84.2% versus 82.8%,P0.05). The median response for venfalaxine treatment was on the (6.7±3.3) day and for fluoxetine on the (10.2±4.7) day (P0.05). Patients treated with venfalaxine experienced the improvement of depression symptoms in the scores of HAMD and CGI-SI as well as TESS at the end of the study compared to patients treated with fluoxetine, which was not significant (P0.05). Conclusions Venfalaxine is a new option for the patients with depression.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression. Methods 120 patients with depression were randomly administered with venfalaxine (n=60, 57 completed) or fluoxetine (n=60, 58 completed) for 6 weeks. The initial doses of venlafazxine versus fluoxetine were 50mg versus 20 mg daily, and increased gradually to 75~225mg versus 40mg daily in day 7~10. The efficacy was evaluated with HAMD and CGI-SI. The safety profiles were assessed with TESS. Results The overall efficacy of two treatment groups showed no significant difference (84.2% versus 82.8%,P0.05). The median response for venfalaxine treatment was on the (6.7±3.3) day and for fluoxetine on the (10.2±4.7) day (P0.05). Patients treated with venfalaxine experienced the improvement of depression symptoms in the scores of HAMD and CGI-SI as well as TESS at the end of the study compared to patients treated with fluoxetine, which was not significant (P0.05). Conclusions Venfalaxine is a new option for the patients with depression.
Key concepts: Fluoxetine, Hamd, Venlafaxine, Depression (economics), Significant difference, Medicine, Internal medicine, Anesthesia