2010Chinese Journal of General PracticeRequires access

Comparison of Streamlined Liner of Pharynx Airway with Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

Zhao Ji-ying

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of streamlined Liner of the pharynx airway(SLIPA)and endotracheal intubation(ET)on hemodynamics and pharyngalgia in patients undergoing abdominal surgical operation.Methods Sixty patients with ASA class ⅠorⅡ who scheduled for selective abdominal surgical operation under general anesthesia were allocated randomly to SLIPA group(n=30)and ET group(n=30).MAP and HR were recorded before intubation(T0),at 3 min after intubation(T1),3 min before extubation(T2),3 min after extubation(T3).Results HR and MAP at T1,T2 were significantly higher in ET group than those in SLIPA group(P0.05).The incidence of pharyngalgia after surgery in the ET group was higher than that in SLIPA group.Conclusion Ventilation with SLIPA in patients undergoing abdominal surgical operation is better than ET in keeping stable hemodynamics and producing less pharyngalgia in general anesthesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effects of streamlined Liner of the pharynx airway(SLIPA)and endotracheal intubation(ET)on hemodynamics and pharyngalgia in patients undergoing abdominal surgical operation.Methods Sixty patients with ASA class ⅠorⅡ who scheduled for selective abdominal surgical operation under general anesthesia were allocated randomly to SLIPA group(n=30)and ET group(n=30).MAP and HR were recorded before intubation(T0),at 3 min after intubation(T1),3 min before extubation(T2),3 min after extubation(T3).Results HR and MAP at T1,T2 were significantly higher in ET group than those in SLIPA group(P0.05).The incidence of pharyngalgia after surgery in the ET group was higher than that in SLIPA group.Conclusion Ventilation with SLIPA in patients undergoing abdominal surgical operation is better than ET in keeping stable hemodynamics and producing less pharyngalgia in general anesthesia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effects of streamlined Liner of the pharynx airway(SLIPA)and endotracheal intubation(ET)on hemodynamics and pharyngalgia in patients undergoing abdominal surgical operation.Methods Sixty patients with ASA class ⅠorⅡ who scheduled for selective abdominal surgical operation under general anesthesia were allocated randomly to SLIPA group(n=30)and ET group(n=30).MAP and HR were recorded before intubation(T0),at 3 min after intubation(T1),3 min before extubation(T2),3 min after extubation(T3).Results HR and MAP at T1,T2 were significantly higher in ET group than those in SLIPA group(P0.05).The incidence of pharyngalgia after surgery in the ET group was higher than that in SLIPA group.Conclusion Ventilation with SLIPA in patients undergoing abdominal surgical operation is better than ET in keeping stable hemodynamics and producing less pharyngalgia in general anesthesia.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Pharynx, Intubation, Airway, Hemodynamics, Endotracheal intubation, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Streamlined Liner of Pharynx Airway with Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens