2012China Medical HeraldRequires access

Cost-effectiveness analysis of domestic and import somatostatin in the treatment of acute pancreatitis

GU Qiujun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of domestic somatostatin and import somatostatin for acute pancreatitis.Methods Two therapeutic regimens for acute pancreatitis were compared by a cost-effectiveness analysis.These regimens were composed of domestic somatostatin+basal therapy(group A);import somatostatin+basal therapy(group B).Results The effective rates of the domestic somatostatin and the import somatostatin after completion of the treatment course were similar(85.71% vs 89.47%,P 0.05);the time of abdominal pain alleviation and recovery time of serum amylase,white blood cell were not obviously different;the cost of group A was significantly lower than group B(P 0.05),the cost-effectiveness ratios were 1 066.16 and 2 901.98 respectively.There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse reactions.Conclusion Domestic somatostatin is cheaper yet with higher cost-effective ratio as compared with the import somatostatin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of domestic somatostatin and import somatostatin for acute pancreatitis.Methods Two therapeutic regimens for acute pancreatitis were compared by a cost-effectiveness analysis.These regimens were composed of domestic somatostatin+basal therapy(group A);import somatostatin+basal therapy(group B).Results The effective rates of the domestic somatostatin and the import somatostatin after completion of the treatment course were similar(85.71% vs 89.47%,P 0.05);the time of abdominal pain alleviation and recovery time of serum amylase,white blood cell were not obviously different;the cost of group A was significantly lower than group B(P 0.05),the cost-effectiveness ratios were 1 066.16 and 2 901.98 respectively.There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse reactions.Conclusion Domestic somatostatin is cheaper yet with higher cost-effective ratio as compared with the import somatostatin.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of domestic somatostatin and import somatostatin for acute pancreatitis.Methods Two therapeutic regimens for acute pancreatitis were compared by a cost-effectiveness analysis.These regimens were composed of domestic somatostatin+basal therapy(group A);import somatostatin+basal therapy(group B).Results The effective rates of the domestic somatostatin and the import somatostatin after completion of the treatment course were similar(85.71% vs 89.47%,P 0.05);the time of abdominal pain alleviation and recovery time of serum amylase,white blood cell were not obviously different;the cost of group A was significantly lower than group B(P 0.05),the cost-effectiveness ratios were 1 066.16 and 2 901.98 respectively.There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse reactions.Conclusion Domestic somatostatin is cheaper yet with higher cost-effective ratio as compared with the import somatostatin.

Key concepts: Somatostatin, Medicine, Basal (medicine), Acute pancreatitis, Internal medicine, Pancreatitis, Gastroenterology, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-effectiveness analysis of domestic and import somatostatin in the treatment of acute pancreatitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens