2002PubMedRequires access

[Activation of random-donor platelet concentrates and platelet prepared from random-donor apheresis collections during storage].

Lin Jun-jie, Huahua Fan, Qing Ma, Mingliang Feng, Xing-Feng Shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The activation of random-donor platelet concentrates and platelets prepared from random-donor apheresis collections (plateletpheresis) during storage were studied. Percentage of CD62p staining and mean channel fluorescence (MCF) of CD41 of two kinds of platelets during storage on day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 5 were determined by flow cytometry. The results showed that percentages of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 in plateletpheresis were (18.91 +/- 6.25)%, (19.48 +/- 8.27)%, (22.82 +/- 6.06)%, (56.71 +/- 11.79)% and (8.09 +/- 2.38)%, (8.13 +/- 2.45)%, (8.44 +/- 2.51)%, (19.87 +/- 6.13)%, while the results of platelet concentrates were (30.65 +/- 12.33)%, (31.46 +/- 11.86)%, (32.51 +/- 13.05)%, (63.55 +/- 13.27)% and (10.33 +/- 4.37)%, (11.09 +/- 6.61)%, (13.46 +/- 9.69)%, (24.41 +/- 10.15)%, respectively. The platelet count and pH value were also determined. The platelet number, pH value, percentage of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 had no significant difference within 3 days of platelet storage. The platelet number and pH value decreased significantly (P < 0.001), while percentages of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 increased significantly (P < 0.001) on day 5 of storage. It is concluded that the quality of plateletpheresis is better than platelet concentrate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The activation of random-donor platelet concentrates and platelets prepared from random-donor apheresis collections (plateletpheresis) during storage were studied. Percentage of CD62p staining and mean channel fluorescence (MCF) of CD41 of two kinds of platelets during storage on day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 5 were determined by flow cytometry. The results showed that percentages of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 in plateletpheresis were (18.91 +/- 6.25)%, (19.48 +/- 8.27)%, (22.82 +/- 6.06)%, (56.71 +/- 11.79)% and (8.09 +/- 2.38)%, (8.13 +/- 2.45)%, (8.44 +/- 2.51)%, (19.87 +/- 6.13)%, while the results of platelet concentrates were (30.65 +/- 12.33)%, (31.46 +/- 11.86)%, (32.51 +/- 13.05)%, (63.55 +/- 13.27)% and (10.33 +/- 4.37)%, (11.09 +/- 6.61)%, (13.46 +/- 9.69)%, (24.41 +/- 10.15)%, respectively. The platelet count and pH value were also determined. The platelet number, pH value, percentage of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 had no significant difference within 3 days of platelet storage. The platelet number and pH value decreased significantly (P < 0.001), while percentages of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 increased significantly (P < 0.001) on day 5 of storage. It is concluded that the quality of plateletpheresis is better than platelet concentrate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The activation of random-donor platelet concentrates and platelets prepared from random-donor apheresis collections (plateletpheresis) during storage were studied. Percentage of CD62p staining and mean channel fluorescence (MCF) of CD41 of two kinds of platelets during storage on day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 5 were determined by flow cytometry. The results showed that percentages of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 in plateletpheresis were (18.91 +/- 6.25)%, (19.48 +/- 8.27)%, (22.82 +/- 6.06)%, (56.71 +/- 11.79)% and (8.09 +/- 2.38)%, (8.13 +/- 2.45)%, (8.44 +/- 2.51)%, (19.87 +/- 6.13)%, while the results of platelet concentrates were (30.65 +/- 12.33)%, (31.46 +/- 11.86)%, (32.51 +/- 13.05)%, (63.55 +/- 13.27)% and (10.33 +/- 4.37)%, (11.09 +/- 6.61)%, (13.46 +/- 9.69)%, (24.41 +/- 10.15)%, respectively. The platelet count and pH value were also determined. The platelet number, pH value, percentage of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 had no significant difference within 3 days of platelet storage. The platelet number and pH value decreased significantly (P < 0.001), while percentages of CD62p staining and MCF of CD41 increased significantly (P < 0.001) on day 5 of storage. It is concluded that the quality of plateletpheresis is better than platelet concentrate.

Key concepts: Plateletpheresis, Platelet, Apheresis, Platelet concentrate, Staining, Chemistry, Flow cytometry, Andrology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Activation of random-donor platelet concentrates and platelet prepared from random-donor apheresis collections during storage]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens