Contrast of Effectiveness for Stereotactictie and Craniotomy for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Wen Li
Abstract
Wen Li
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of stereotactic aspiration for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: The effect of the hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage treated with CT-assisted stereotactic operation was compared to general craniotomy. Results: Hemorrhage evacution rate for stereotactic group was 55%. ADLⅠ~Ⅲ of patients after 6 months in stereotactic group was singnificantly improved than in control group and the former mortality was reduced. Conclusion: Stereotactic aspiration has advantage of small trauma,short process and credible effect. It is good for applicable technology.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of stereotactic aspiration for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: The effect of the hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage treated with CT-assisted stereotactic operation was compared to general craniotomy. Results: Hemorrhage evacution rate for stereotactic group was 55%. ADLⅠ~Ⅲ of patients after 6 months in stereotactic group was singnificantly improved than in control group and the former mortality was reduced. Conclusion: Stereotactic aspiration has advantage of small trauma,short process and credible effect. It is good for applicable technology.
Key concepts: Medicine, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Craniotomy, Brain hemorrhage, Anesthesia, Surgery, Glasgow Coma Scale, Neurosurgery