2008Journal of Nanjing University of TechnologyRequires access

Drafting the Narrative Theory of Post-deconstruction:A Theoretical Analysis of Daniel Punday's Post Constructionist Narrative Theory

Liu Aipin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When the narrative theory of deconstruction re-emerged in the 1990s,Daniel Punday put forward his narrative theory of post-deconstruction,incurring new debates and disputes in the academic field.A study of Punday's post deconstructionist theory shows that although his theory has many merits,it has weaknesses.For example,his observation of the theory is not deep enough,and the explanation of the fundamental concepts is not precise. The 1990s witnessed the renaissance of narratology,moving from the classical phase to the postclassical phase.When the narrative theory of deconstruction was still in its prevalence,Daniel Punday initiated the theory of narrative after deconstruction,incurring as much debate as its dispute.This paper attempts to analyze Punday's theory of narrative after deconstruction,so as to shed much light upon its insights and blindness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When the narrative theory of deconstruction re-emerged in the 1990s,Daniel Punday put forward his narrative theory of post-deconstruction,incurring new debates and disputes in the academic field.A study of Punday's post deconstructionist theory shows that although his theory has many merits,it has weaknesses.For example,his observation of the theory is not deep enough,and the explanation of the fundamental concepts is not precise. The 1990s witnessed the renaissance of narratology,moving from the classical phase to the postclassical phase.When the narrative theory of deconstruction was still in its prevalence,Daniel Punday initiated the theory of narrative after deconstruction,incurring as much debate as its dispute.This paper attempts to analyze Punday's theory of narrative after deconstruction,so as to shed much light upon its insights and blindness.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When the narrative theory of deconstruction re-emerged in the 1990s,Daniel Punday put forward his narrative theory of post-deconstruction,incurring new debates and disputes in the academic field.A study of Punday's post deconstructionist theory shows that although his theory has many merits,it has weaknesses.For example,his observation of the theory is not deep enough,and the explanation of the fundamental concepts is not precise. The 1990s witnessed the renaissance of narratology,moving from the classical phase to the postclassical phase.When the narrative theory of deconstruction was still in its prevalence,Daniel Punday initiated the theory of narrative after deconstruction,incurring as much debate as its dispute.This paper attempts to analyze Punday's theory of narrative after deconstruction,so as to shed much light upon its insights and blindness.

Key concepts: Deconstruction (building), Narratology, Narrative, Narrative inquiry, Epistemology, Narrative criticism, Narrative structure, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Drafting the Narrative Theory of Post-deconstruction:A Theoretical Analysis of Daniel Punday's Post Constructionist Narrative Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens