2014Journal of Minimally Invasive MedicineRequires access

Clinical efficacy comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy

Huang Bingchen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with traditional open cholecystectomy. Methods 210 cases receiving cholecystectomy were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 105 cases for each. Patients in observation group were given laparoscopic cholecystectomy,patients in control group were given traditional open cholecystectomy. Surgery efficacy and complications of two groups were compared. Results The operative and postoperative conditions of observation group were significantly better than those of control group( P 0. 05). Complication incidence of observation group was 9. 52%,which was significantly lower than that of control group( 18. 10%),( P 0. 05). Conclusions Compared with conventional open cholecystectomy,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantage of better efficacy,less complications,lighter finical burden and faster recovery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with traditional open cholecystectomy. Methods 210 cases receiving cholecystectomy were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 105 cases for each. Patients in observation group were given laparoscopic cholecystectomy,patients in control group were given traditional open cholecystectomy. Surgery efficacy and complications of two groups were compared. Results The operative and postoperative conditions of observation group were significantly better than those of control group( P 0. 05). Complication incidence of observation group was 9. 52%,which was significantly lower than that of control group( 18. 10%),( P 0. 05). Conclusions Compared with conventional open cholecystectomy,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantage of better efficacy,less complications,lighter finical burden and faster recovery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with traditional open cholecystectomy. Methods 210 cases receiving cholecystectomy were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 105 cases for each. Patients in observation group were given laparoscopic cholecystectomy,patients in control group were given traditional open cholecystectomy. Surgery efficacy and complications of two groups were compared. Results The operative and postoperative conditions of observation group were significantly better than those of control group( P 0. 05). Complication incidence of observation group was 9. 52%,which was significantly lower than that of control group( 18. 10%),( P 0. 05). Conclusions Compared with conventional open cholecystectomy,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantage of better efficacy,less complications,lighter finical burden and faster recovery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Open cholecystectomy, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Clinical efficacy, Incidence (geometry), Surgery, Complication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical efficacy comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens