2014China Modern MedicineRequires access

Clinical effect comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy

Meng Wei-we

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate clinical effect and the incidence of postoperative complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Methods 110 cases of patients with cholecystectomy from May 2010 to April2013 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group,laparoscopic cholecystectomy treatment was used in observation group(55 cases),open cholecystectomy treatment was used in control group(55 cases).The incidence rate of complication and clinical efficacy in two groups was compared respectively. Results The incidence rate of complication in observation group was 9.09%,lower than that in control group(25.45%),with statistical difference(P0.05).Operative time,discharge time,ambulation time and hospital stay time in observation group was shorter than that in control group respectively,blood loss in observation group was less than that in control group,with statistical difference(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional open surgery,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has shorter operation time,small trauma,less intraoperative blood loss,faster recovery and low complication rate,should be the preferred way of cholecystectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate clinical effect and the incidence of postoperative complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Methods 110 cases of patients with cholecystectomy from May 2010 to April2013 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group,laparoscopic cholecystectomy treatment was used in observation group(55 cases),open cholecystectomy treatment was used in control group(55 cases).The incidence rate of complication and clinical efficacy in two groups was compared respectively. Results The incidence rate of complication in observation group was 9.09%,lower than that in control group(25.45%),with statistical difference(P0.05).Operative time,discharge time,ambulation time and hospital stay time in observation group was shorter than that in control group respectively,blood loss in observation group was less than that in control group,with statistical difference(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional open surgery,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has shorter operation time,small trauma,less intraoperative blood loss,faster recovery and low complication rate,should be the preferred way of cholecystectomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate clinical effect and the incidence of postoperative complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Methods 110 cases of patients with cholecystectomy from May 2010 to April2013 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group,laparoscopic cholecystectomy treatment was used in observation group(55 cases),open cholecystectomy treatment was used in control group(55 cases).The incidence rate of complication and clinical efficacy in two groups was compared respectively. Results The incidence rate of complication in observation group was 9.09%,lower than that in control group(25.45%),with statistical difference(P0.05).Operative time,discharge time,ambulation time and hospital stay time in observation group was shorter than that in control group respectively,blood loss in observation group was less than that in control group,with statistical difference(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional open surgery,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has shorter operation time,small trauma,less intraoperative blood loss,faster recovery and low complication rate,should be the preferred way of cholecystectomy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Complication, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Cholecystectomy, Blood loss, Incidence (geometry), Open cholecystectomy, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effect comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens