Multiple Dimensions of Literal Translation
Jun Xu
Abstract
Jun Xu
Abstract
The literal translation has always been misunderstood. It is either confused with the for word translation or blamed for its illisibility. Based on the translation theories and the practices of Benjamin, Berman and Steiner, this article is to reevaluate the literal translation from its linguistic philosophical, poetical, ethical and cultural dimensions and thereby to clear up people’s misunderstandings of literal translation and to confirm the importance of the latter to translation studies and practices.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The literal translation has always been misunderstood. It is either confused with the for word translation or blamed for its illisibility. Based on the translation theories and the practices of Benjamin, Berman and Steiner, this article is to reevaluate the literal translation from its linguistic philosophical, poetical, ethical and cultural dimensions and thereby to clear up people’s misunderstandings of literal translation and to confirm the importance of the latter to translation studies and practices.
Key concepts: Literal translation, Literal (mathematical logic), Translation (biology), Linguistics, Dynamic and formal equivalence, Translation studies, Word (group theory), Literal and figurative language