The clinical analysis of the Prolift and the traditional pelvic floor reconstructive surgery

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect and applicate value of the prolift pelvic floor reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.Methods 20 patients with pelvic organ prolapse were randomly divided into group A of 8 cases and group B of 12 cases.The group A was given with the prolift pelvic floor reconstructive surgery;the group B was given with the traditional surgery.Then observed and compared the perioperative and postoperative information of 2 groups.Results The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the group A were less than that of the group B;the postoperative morbidity and utility ratio of analgesic drugs of the group A were lower than that of the group B;The time for anus exhaust,time for getting down from bed and length of hospital stay of the group A were less than that of the group B,and the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).Patients were followed up 6 months after the surgery,and there was no significant difference of recrudescence between 2 groups(P0.05).Conclusion Compare to the traditional pelvic floor reconstructive surgery,the prolift surgery has the preponderances in smaller wound,less blood loss and the shorter length of hospital stay,with some dominance in certain conditions,but it can not completely replace the traditional surgery.