2013Hebei yixueRequires access

Study on the Comparation of Children with Bilateral Inguinal Hernia in Laparoscopic Surgery and Single-incision Surgery

Luo Zebin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of two surgical methods for bilateral inguinal hernia.Method: The patients were randomly divided into group A and B,group A for the laparoscopic group(n=48),group B for the single-incision surgery(n=39).Compared two groups of the surgical time,blood loss and postoperative recovery,including postoperative recovery time,postoperative complications,and postoperative swelling,wound infection,hematoma,incisional hernia,ischemic orchitis after surgery relapse rate.Result:Operative time,blood loss,incision length differences were statistically significant between two groups(P 0.05),while no significant differences in postoperative complications(P 0.05).Conclusion: The laparoscopic treatment for bilateral inguinal hernia in the operative time,operative bleeding was significantly better than traditional suprapubic single incision,without increasing postoperative complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the effect of two surgical methods for bilateral inguinal hernia.Method: The patients were randomly divided into group A and B,group A for the laparoscopic group(n=48),group B for the single-incision surgery(n=39).Compared two groups of the surgical time,blood loss and postoperative recovery,including postoperative recovery time,postoperative complications,and postoperative swelling,wound infection,hematoma,incisional hernia,ischemic orchitis after surgery relapse rate.Result:Operative time,blood loss,incision length differences were statistically significant between two groups(P 0.05),while no significant differences in postoperative complications(P 0.05).Conclusion: The laparoscopic treatment for bilateral inguinal hernia in the operative time,operative bleeding was significantly better than traditional suprapubic single incision,without increasing postoperative complications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of two surgical methods for bilateral inguinal hernia.Method: The patients were randomly divided into group A and B,group A for the laparoscopic group(n=48),group B for the single-incision surgery(n=39).Compared two groups of the surgical time,blood loss and postoperative recovery,including postoperative recovery time,postoperative complications,and postoperative swelling,wound infection,hematoma,incisional hernia,ischemic orchitis after surgery relapse rate.Result:Operative time,blood loss,incision length differences were statistically significant between two groups(P 0.05),while no significant differences in postoperative complications(P 0.05).Conclusion: The laparoscopic treatment for bilateral inguinal hernia in the operative time,operative bleeding was significantly better than traditional suprapubic single incision,without increasing postoperative complications.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Blood loss, Inguinal hernia, Hematoma, Laparoscopic surgery, Hernia, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on the Comparation of Children with Bilateral Inguinal Hernia in Laparoscopic Surgery and Single-incision Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens