2009•Journal of South China Normal UniversityRequires access

Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism——the criticism on deliberative democracy in procedure terms

Mao Gen-hon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Liberal democracy faces crisis and dilemma in the present era. Habermas has formulated deliberative democracy theory in terms of procedure to reconstruct the legitimacy of the liberal democracy. Mouffe, the representative of post Marxism, however, launched challenges and criticism against Habermas deliberative democracy theory, undermined two of the important theoretical presuppositions of the theory, and put forward an alternative model for deliberative democracy-agonistic pluralism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Liberal democracy faces crisis and dilemma in the present era. Habermas has formulated deliberative democracy theory in terms of procedure to reconstruct the legitimacy of the liberal democracy. Mouffe, the representative of post Marxism, however, launched challenges and criticism against Habermas deliberative democracy theory, undermined two of the important theoretical presuppositions of the theory, and put forward an alternative model for deliberative democracy-agonistic pluralism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Liberal democracy faces crisis and dilemma in the present era. Habermas has formulated deliberative democracy theory in terms of procedure to reconstruct the legitimacy of the liberal democracy. Mouffe, the representative of post Marxism, however, launched challenges and criticism against Habermas deliberative democracy theory, undermined two of the important theoretical presuppositions of the theory, and put forward an alternative model for deliberative democracy-agonistic pluralism.

Key concepts: Deliberative democracy, Pluralism (philosophy), Democracy, Criticism, Dilemma, Liberal democracy, Legitimacy, Agonistic behaviour

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism——the criticism on deliberative democracy in procedure terms — Research Paper | ScholarLens