Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism——the criticism on deliberative democracy in procedure terms
Mao Gen-hon
Abstract
Mao Gen-hon
Abstract
Liberal democracy faces crisis and dilemma in the present era. Habermas has formulated deliberative democracy theory in terms of procedure to reconstruct the legitimacy of the liberal democracy. Mouffe, the representative of post Marxism, however, launched challenges and criticism against Habermas deliberative democracy theory, undermined two of the important theoretical presuppositions of the theory, and put forward an alternative model for deliberative democracy-agonistic pluralism.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Liberal democracy faces crisis and dilemma in the present era. Habermas has formulated deliberative democracy theory in terms of procedure to reconstruct the legitimacy of the liberal democracy. Mouffe, the representative of post Marxism, however, launched challenges and criticism against Habermas deliberative democracy theory, undermined two of the important theoretical presuppositions of the theory, and put forward an alternative model for deliberative democracy-agonistic pluralism.
Key concepts: Deliberative democracy, Pluralism (philosophy), Democracy, Criticism, Dilemma, Liberal democracy, Legitimacy, Agonistic behaviour