2009•Chinese Journal of EndourologyRequires access

Blood loss comparison of transurethral plasmakinetic resection versus conventional transurethral resection of the prostate

Yanjuan Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare blood loss between transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP).Methods From October 2007 to April 2008,30 cases of patient with BPH underwent PKRP;While from May to July 2008,30 cases of patient with BPH underwent TURP.Each patient either in PKRP group or in TURP group was not selected.The data of these 60 patients was analyzed.In PKRP group,mean age was(74.2 ± 7.0) years,mean prostate volume was(49.3 ± 33.1)ml;In TURP group,mean age was(73.3±7.2)years,mean prostate volume was(51.1±23.2)ml.All infused fluid during the operation was collected.The volume and hemoglobin concentration of the fluid were measured exactly.Results The difference has no statistic significant in weight of resected tissue(20.1±14.3 g VS 23.6±13.1 g) and the average time of op-eration(111.3±42.5 min VS 108.0±42.2 min) between PKRP and TURP(P 0.05).The blood loss of PKRP was significantly less than that of TURP(86.3±79.9 ml VS 201.8±178.7 ml,P 0.005).The blood loss per gram of prostate resected of PKRP was significantly less than that of TURP(3.7±1.9 ml/g VS 8.3±6.1 ml/g,P 0.001).Conclusion The blood loss of PKRP is significantly less than that of conventional TURP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare blood loss between transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP).Methods From October 2007 to April 2008,30 cases of patient with BPH underwent PKRP;While from May to July 2008,30 cases of patient with BPH underwent TURP.Each patient either in PKRP group or in TURP group was not selected.The data of these 60 patients was analyzed.In PKRP group,mean age was(74.2 ± 7.0) years,mean prostate volume was(49.3 ± 33.1)ml;In TURP group,mean age was(73.3±7.2)years,mean prostate volume was(51.1±23.2)ml.All infused fluid during the operation was collected.The volume and hemoglobin concentration of the fluid were measured exactly.Results The difference has no statistic significant in weight of resected tissue(20.1±14.3 g VS 23.6±13.1 g) and the average time of op-eration(111.3±42.5 min VS 108.0±42.2 min) between PKRP and TURP(P 0.05).The blood loss of PKRP was significantly less than that of TURP(86.3±79.9 ml VS 201.8±178.7 ml,P 0.005).The blood loss per gram of prostate resected of PKRP was significantly less than that of TURP(3.7±1.9 ml/g VS 8.3±6.1 ml/g,P 0.001).Conclusion The blood loss of PKRP is significantly less than that of conventional TURP.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare blood loss between transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP).Methods From October 2007 to April 2008,30 cases of patient with BPH underwent PKRP;While from May to July 2008,30 cases of patient with BPH underwent TURP.Each patient either in PKRP group or in TURP group was not selected.The data of these 60 patients was analyzed.In PKRP group,mean age was(74.2 ± 7.0) years,mean prostate volume was(49.3 ± 33.1)ml;In TURP group,mean age was(73.3±7.2)years,mean prostate volume was(51.1±23.2)ml.All infused fluid during the operation was collected.The volume and hemoglobin concentration of the fluid were measured exactly.Results The difference has no statistic significant in weight of resected tissue(20.1±14.3 g VS 23.6±13.1 g) and the average time of op-eration(111.3±42.5 min VS 108.0±42.2 min) between PKRP and TURP(P 0.05).The blood loss of PKRP was significantly less than that of TURP(86.3±79.9 ml VS 201.8±178.7 ml,P 0.005).The blood loss per gram of prostate resected of PKRP was significantly less than that of TURP(3.7±1.9 ml/g VS 8.3±6.1 ml/g,P 0.001).Conclusion The blood loss of PKRP is significantly less than that of conventional TURP.

Key concepts: Medicine, Blood loss, Prostate, Urology, Transurethral resection of the prostate, Resection, Prostatectomy, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Blood loss comparison of transurethral plasmakinetic resection versus conventional transurethral resection of the prostate — Research Paper | ScholarLens