2011PubMedRequires access

[Safety and efficacy of Entecavir combined with Adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B who fail to respond to nucleoside analog treatment].

Yan Li, Zhanhui Wang, Jie Yang, Bin Zhou, Yabing Guo, Jie Peng, Jian Sun, Jinlin Hou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combined therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who experienced failure of treatment with single or multiple nucleoside analogs, and analyze the factors that affect the patients response to the treatment. METHODS: Forty-five CHB patients who experienced treatment failure with sequential or/and combined nucleoside analogs received the combined therapy with entecavir and adefovir lasting for at least 6 months. The viroloigcal response (VR), biochemical response (BR) and combined response (CR) at 24 and 48 weeks of the treatment were evaluated. Univairante analysis was used to identify the factors that affect the response to the anti-viral therapy. RESULTS: The VR, BR and CR were 67.7%, 77.8% and 57.8% at 24 weeks, as compared to 76.2%, 78.6% and 61.9% at 48 weeks, respectively. The VR differed significantly between patients with a baseline HBV DNA level [lg(copies/ml)] of 3-6 and those with a level over 6 (85.2% vs 40%, Z=-4.796, P=0.037) at 48 weeks. The presence and absence of cirrhosis at the initial treatment significantly affected the BR at 24 weeks (17.1% vs 82.9%, P=0.048) and at 48 weeks (23.8% vs 76.2%, P=0.023). CONCLUSION: Entecavir combined with adefovir is an effective rescue therapy in CHB patients after failure of treatment with nucleoside analogs. Patients with a lower baseline HBV DNA level without cirrhosis may have better response to the combined treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combined therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who experienced failure of treatment with single or multiple nucleoside analogs, and analyze the factors that affect the patients response to the treatment. METHODS: Forty-five CHB patients who experienced treatment failure with sequential or/and combined nucleoside analogs received the combined therapy with entecavir and adefovir lasting for at least 6 months. The viroloigcal response (VR), biochemical response (BR) and combined response (CR) at 24 and 48 weeks of the treatment were evaluated. Univairante analysis was used to identify the factors that affect the response to the anti-viral therapy. RESULTS: The VR, BR and CR were 67.7%, 77.8% and 57.8% at 24 weeks, as compared to 76.2%, 78.6% and 61.9% at 48 weeks, respectively. The VR differed significantly between patients with a baseline HBV DNA level [lg(copies/ml)] of 3-6 and those with a level over 6 (85.2% vs 40%, Z=-4.796, P=0.037) at 48 weeks. The presence and absence of cirrhosis at the initial treatment significantly affected the BR at 24 weeks (17.1% vs 82.9%, P=0.048) and at 48 weeks (23.8% vs 76.2%, P=0.023). CONCLUSION: Entecavir combined with adefovir is an effective rescue therapy in CHB patients after failure of treatment with nucleoside analogs. Patients with a lower baseline HBV DNA level without cirrhosis may have better response to the combined treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combined therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who experienced failure of treatment with single or multiple nucleoside analogs, and analyze the factors that affect the patients response to the treatment. METHODS: Forty-five CHB patients who experienced treatment failure with sequential or/and combined nucleoside analogs received the combined therapy with entecavir and adefovir lasting for at least 6 months. The viroloigcal response (VR), biochemical response (BR) and combined response (CR) at 24 and 48 weeks of the treatment were evaluated. Univairante analysis was used to identify the factors that affect the response to the anti-viral therapy. RESULTS: The VR, BR and CR were 67.7%, 77.8% and 57.8% at 24 weeks, as compared to 76.2%, 78.6% and 61.9% at 48 weeks, respectively. The VR differed significantly between patients with a baseline HBV DNA level [lg(copies/ml)] of 3-6 and those with a level over 6 (85.2% vs 40%, Z=-4.796, P=0.037) at 48 weeks. The presence and absence of cirrhosis at the initial treatment significantly affected the BR at 24 weeks (17.1% vs 82.9%, P=0.048) and at 48 weeks (23.8% vs 76.2%, P=0.023). CONCLUSION: Entecavir combined with adefovir is an effective rescue therapy in CHB patients after failure of treatment with nucleoside analogs. Patients with a lower baseline HBV DNA level without cirrhosis may have better response to the combined treatment.

Key concepts: Adefovir, Entecavir, Medicine, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Nucleoside, Cirrhosis, Hepatitis B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Safety and efficacy of Entecavir combined with Adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B who fail to respond to nucleoside analog treatment]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens