2013PubMedRequires access

The short-term efficacy of entecavir in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B: influence of sequential adefovir-refractoriness.

Kim Jh, Kim Ys, Young Kul Jung, Yeon Suk Kim, Oh Sang Kwon, Yang Suh Ku, Duck Joo Choi, Ju Hyun Kim

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sequential antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B may lead to the selection of multidrug-resistant mutation. This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of entecavir in patients that have experienced adefovir monotherapy failure after the development of lamivudine resistance. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-three patients with confirmed genotypic lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B were treated with entecavir. Thirty patients were switched to entecavir directly (LAM-ETV group), whereas the remaining 23 were adefovir-refractory patients who were switched to entecavir (LAM-ADV-ETV group). These 23 patients included 9 patients with inadequate response (ADV-I subgroup) and 14 that exhibited adefovir resistance (ADV-R subgroup). RESULTS: Significantly greater reductions in HBV DNA levels were observed after 24, 48 and 72 weeks of entecavir therapy in the LAM-ETV group than in the LAM-ADV-ETV group, respectively. However, between these two groups at 48 and 72 weeks, no significant differences were observed in cumulative proportions of virological response or breakthrough, respectively. Furthermore, efficacy of entecavir was not significantly different in the ADV-I and ADV-R subgroups. Four patients in the LAM-ETV group and six patients in the LAM-ADV-ETV group developed genotypic resistance to entecavir. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir therapy is less effective in adefovir-refractory patients with prior lamivudine resistance than in lamivudine-resistant patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sequential antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B may lead to the selection of multidrug-resistant mutation. This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of entecavir in patients that have experienced adefovir monotherapy failure after the development of lamivudine resistance. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-three patients with confirmed genotypic lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B were treated with entecavir. Thirty patients were switched to entecavir directly (LAM-ETV group), whereas the remaining 23 were adefovir-refractory patients who were switched to entecavir (LAM-ADV-ETV group). These 23 patients included 9 patients with inadequate response (ADV-I subgroup) and 14 that exhibited adefovir resistance (ADV-R subgroup). RESULTS: Significantly greater reductions in HBV DNA levels were observed after 24, 48 and 72 weeks of entecavir therapy in the LAM-ETV group than in the LAM-ADV-ETV group, respectively. However, between these two groups at 48 and 72 weeks, no significant differences were observed in cumulative proportions of virological response or breakthrough, respectively. Furthermore, efficacy of entecavir was not significantly different in the ADV-I and ADV-R subgroups. Four patients in the LAM-ETV group and six patients in the LAM-ADV-ETV group developed genotypic resistance to entecavir. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir therapy is less effective in adefovir-refractory patients with prior lamivudine resistance than in lamivudine-resistant patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sequential antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B may lead to the selection of multidrug-resistant mutation. This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of entecavir in patients that have experienced adefovir monotherapy failure after the development of lamivudine resistance. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-three patients with confirmed genotypic lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B were treated with entecavir. Thirty patients were switched to entecavir directly (LAM-ETV group), whereas the remaining 23 were adefovir-refractory patients who were switched to entecavir (LAM-ADV-ETV group). These 23 patients included 9 patients with inadequate response (ADV-I subgroup) and 14 that exhibited adefovir resistance (ADV-R subgroup). RESULTS: Significantly greater reductions in HBV DNA levels were observed after 24, 48 and 72 weeks of entecavir therapy in the LAM-ETV group than in the LAM-ADV-ETV group, respectively. However, between these two groups at 48 and 72 weeks, no significant differences were observed in cumulative proportions of virological response or breakthrough, respectively. Furthermore, efficacy of entecavir was not significantly different in the ADV-I and ADV-R subgroups. Four patients in the LAM-ETV group and six patients in the LAM-ADV-ETV group developed genotypic resistance to entecavir. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir therapy is less effective in adefovir-refractory patients with prior lamivudine resistance than in lamivudine-resistant patients.

Key concepts: Entecavir, Adefovir, Lamivudine, Medicine, Refractory (planetary science), Chronic hepatitis, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The short-term efficacy of entecavir in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B: influence of sequential adefovir-refractoriness. — Research Paper | ScholarLens