2005Computer Knowledge and TechnologyRequires access

The Comparison of CORBA,DCOM and Java/RMI

Dong De-cun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Distributed object technology mainly establishes application system skeleton and object components for a distributed heterogeneous network. Under the supports of the application system skeleton, developer can encapsulate the functions as an object, which can be managed and used more expediently. Those distributed objects in different platform can interoperate as a unified whole. At present, three of the most popular distributed object paradigms are OMG's Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Microsoft's Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) and JavaSoft's Java/Remote Method Invocation (Java/RMI). In this article, we will examine the differences between these three technologies, and appreciate the merits and innards of each of the distributed object technology from a programmer's standpoint and an architectural standpoint.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Distributed object technology mainly establishes application system skeleton and object components for a distributed heterogeneous network. Under the supports of the application system skeleton, developer can encapsulate the functions as an object, which can be managed and used more expediently. Those distributed objects in different platform can interoperate as a unified whole. At present, three of the most popular distributed object paradigms are OMG's Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Microsoft's Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) and JavaSoft's Java/Remote Method Invocation (Java/RMI). In this article, we will examine the differences between these three technologies, and appreciate the merits and innards of each of the distributed object technology from a programmer's standpoint and an architectural standpoint.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Distributed object technology mainly establishes application system skeleton and object components for a distributed heterogeneous network. Under the supports of the application system skeleton, developer can encapsulate the functions as an object, which can be managed and used more expediently. Those distributed objects in different platform can interoperate as a unified whole. At present, three of the most popular distributed object paradigms are OMG's Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Microsoft's Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) and JavaSoft's Java/Remote Method Invocation (Java/RMI). In this article, we will examine the differences between these three technologies, and appreciate the merits and innards of each of the distributed object technology from a programmer's standpoint and an architectural standpoint.

Key concepts: Common Object Request Broker Architecture, Distributed Component Object Model, Computer science, Distributed object, Interoperable Object Reference, Java, Programmer, Component Object Model

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Comparison of CORBA,DCOM and Java/RMI — Research Paper | ScholarLens