Examining Validity of Three Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales
Su-yan Wei
Abstract
Su-yan Wei
Abstract
Objective To examine the predictive validity of Norton,Braden and Waterlow scales for assessing pressure ulcer risk among inpatients in Xinjiang province.Methods A total of 500 inpatients were randomly selected and were assessed by using Norton,Braden and Waterlow scale,and their skin integrity were examined.Sensitivity(Se),specificity(Sp) of the 3 scales were calculated.Results The occurrence rate of pressure ulcers was 2.8%.For the whole population,Braden scale showed good predictive validity(Se=0.8571,Sp=0.7160),for the Han nationality,Braden scale was more sensitive(Se=0.8750,Sp=0.7438),while for the minority patients in Xinjiang province,Waterlow scale was more competent(Se=0.8333,Sp=0.7366).Conclusion It is suggested to use Braden scale as first choice for evaluating pressure ulcer risks;and for the minority patients,it should use Waterlow scale together.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To examine the predictive validity of Norton,Braden and Waterlow scales for assessing pressure ulcer risk among inpatients in Xinjiang province.Methods A total of 500 inpatients were randomly selected and were assessed by using Norton,Braden and Waterlow scale,and their skin integrity were examined.Sensitivity(Se),specificity(Sp) of the 3 scales were calculated.Results The occurrence rate of pressure ulcers was 2.8%.For the whole population,Braden scale showed good predictive validity(Se=0.8571,Sp=0.7160),for the Han nationality,Braden scale was more sensitive(Se=0.8750,Sp=0.7438),while for the minority patients in Xinjiang province,Waterlow scale was more competent(Se=0.8333,Sp=0.7366).Conclusion It is suggested to use Braden scale as first choice for evaluating pressure ulcer risks;and for the minority patients,it should use Waterlow scale together.
Key concepts: Scale (ratio), Medicine, Predictive validity, Risk assessment, Clinical psychology, Quantum mechanics, Physics, Computer security