1990ScholarWorks - GVSU (Grand Valley State University)Open access

A Comparison of Predictive Validity of the Norton Scale, the Daly Scale and the Braden Scale

Sharon L. Marini

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive ability of three tools (the Norton Scale, the Braden Scale and the Daly Scale) to predict risk of skin breakdown in a hospitalized population. Neuman's theoretical framework served as the organizational framework for the study.; A convenience sample of 27 patients who were admitted to one of three medical/surgical floors in an acute care hospital were selected for the study. The Braden Scale and the Norton 14 each identified 50% of those subjects who developed pressure ulcers. The Norton Scale 12 identified 96% of those subjects without pressure ulcers who were not predicted and had the lowest false positive rate at 4%. The lowest false negative rate was scored by the Braden and Norton 14 at 50%. The Norton 12 scored highest at 33% for predictive value of a positive test while all three scales scored high at 95% and 96% for predictive value of a negative test.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive ability of three tools (the Norton Scale, the Braden Scale and the Daly Scale) to predict risk of skin breakdown in a hospitalized population. Neuman's theoretical framework served as the organizational framework for the study.; A convenience sample of 27 patients who were admitted to one of three medical/surgical floors in an acute care hospital were selected for the study. The Braden Scale and the Norton 14 each identified 50% of those subjects who developed pressure ulcers. The Norton Scale 12 identified 96% of those subjects without pressure ulcers who were not predicted and had the lowest false positive rate at 4%. The lowest false negative rate was scored by the Braden and Norton 14 at 50%. The Norton 12 scored highest at 33% for predictive value of a positive test while all three scales scored high at 95% and 96% for predictive value of a negative test.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive ability of three tools (the Norton Scale, the Braden Scale and the Daly Scale) to predict risk of skin breakdown in a hospitalized population. Neuman's theoretical framework served as the organizational framework for the study.; A convenience sample of 27 patients who were admitted to one of three medical/surgical floors in an acute care hospital were selected for the study. The Braden Scale and the Norton 14 each identified 50% of those subjects who developed pressure ulcers. The Norton Scale 12 identified 96% of those subjects without pressure ulcers who were not predicted and had the lowest false positive rate at 4%. The lowest false negative rate was scored by the Braden and Norton 14 at 50%. The Norton 12 scored highest at 33% for predictive value of a positive test while all three scales scored high at 95% and 96% for predictive value of a negative test.

Key concepts: Predictive value, Scale (ratio), Predictive validity, Medicine, Acute care, Psychology, Clinical psychology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Predictive Validity of the Norton Scale, the Daly Scale and the Braden Scale — Research Paper | ScholarLens