A Brief Account of the Study on the Arbitrariness and Iconicity of the Linguistic Sign
Yang Hong
Abstract
Yang Hong
Abstract
Since Saussure proposed the arbitrariness of the linguistic sign,numerous experts at home and abroad has been debating on whether the basic nature of the linguistic sign is arbitrary or iconic through holding their views.In general,there exist two different views:one holding that the the basic nature of the linguistic sign is arbitrary while another the basic nature of the linguistic sign is iconic.This essay aims at further helping to recognize the nature of the linguistic sign by making a brief account of the those two views,the philosophical background of the birth of the two natures and their dialectical relation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since Saussure proposed the arbitrariness of the linguistic sign,numerous experts at home and abroad has been debating on whether the basic nature of the linguistic sign is arbitrary or iconic through holding their views.In general,there exist two different views:one holding that the the basic nature of the linguistic sign is arbitrary while another the basic nature of the linguistic sign is iconic.This essay aims at further helping to recognize the nature of the linguistic sign by making a brief account of the those two views,the philosophical background of the birth of the two natures and their dialectical relation.
Key concepts: Arbitrariness, Iconicity, Sign (mathematics), Linguistics, Sign language, Dialectic, Relation (database), Epistemology