2010Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-head and Neck SurgeryRequires access

Comparative study of simple myringoplasty with three different kinds of autologous substitutes

Suijun Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of simple myringoplasty with three different kinds of autologous substitutes. METHODS The patients (107 ears)with tympanic membrane perforation underwent myringoplasty using autologous temporal fascia, perichondrium or tragus cartilage-perichondrium compound. The postoperative healing effects and hearing levels of all cases were studied. RESULTS In healingeffects and hearing levels of the patients with small tympanic membrane perforation, there was no difference among the three kinds of autologous substitutes. Cartilage-perichondrium compound was much better for the patients with large tympanic membrane perforation in primary healing than temporalis fascia and perichondrium(P0.05). At one year after surgery, the tympanic membrane repaired with temporalis fascia or perichondrium perforated again or appeared invaginated and adhesive in some patients. Early hearing improvement of temporalis fascia and perichondrium group was better than that of cartilage-perichondrium compound, but no difference at one year after surgery. CONCLUSION ① All of the three kinds of autologous substitutes are suitable for the myringoplasty of the patients with small tympanic membrane perforation. ② Cartilage-perichondrium compound is much better than temporalis fascia and perichondrium for the patients with large tympanic membrane perforation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of simple myringoplasty with three different kinds of autologous substitutes. METHODS The patients (107 ears)with tympanic membrane perforation underwent myringoplasty using autologous temporal fascia, perichondrium or tragus cartilage-perichondrium compound. The postoperative healing effects and hearing levels of all cases were studied. RESULTS In healingeffects and hearing levels of the patients with small tympanic membrane perforation, there was no difference among the three kinds of autologous substitutes. Cartilage-perichondrium compound was much better for the patients with large tympanic membrane perforation in primary healing than temporalis fascia and perichondrium(P0.05). At one year after surgery, the tympanic membrane repaired with temporalis fascia or perichondrium perforated again or appeared invaginated and adhesive in some patients. Early hearing improvement of temporalis fascia and perichondrium group was better than that of cartilage-perichondrium compound, but no difference at one year after surgery. CONCLUSION ① All of the three kinds of autologous substitutes are suitable for the myringoplasty of the patients with small tympanic membrane perforation. ② Cartilage-perichondrium compound is much better than temporalis fascia and perichondrium for the patients with large tympanic membrane perforation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of simple myringoplasty with three different kinds of autologous substitutes. METHODS The patients (107 ears)with tympanic membrane perforation underwent myringoplasty using autologous temporal fascia, perichondrium or tragus cartilage-perichondrium compound. The postoperative healing effects and hearing levels of all cases were studied. RESULTS In healingeffects and hearing levels of the patients with small tympanic membrane perforation, there was no difference among the three kinds of autologous substitutes. Cartilage-perichondrium compound was much better for the patients with large tympanic membrane perforation in primary healing than temporalis fascia and perichondrium(P0.05). At one year after surgery, the tympanic membrane repaired with temporalis fascia or perichondrium perforated again or appeared invaginated and adhesive in some patients. Early hearing improvement of temporalis fascia and perichondrium group was better than that of cartilage-perichondrium compound, but no difference at one year after surgery. CONCLUSION ① All of the three kinds of autologous substitutes are suitable for the myringoplasty of the patients with small tympanic membrane perforation. ② Cartilage-perichondrium compound is much better than temporalis fascia and perichondrium for the patients with large tympanic membrane perforation.

Key concepts: Perichondrium, Myringoplasty, Medicine, Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Cartilage, Perforation, Fascia, Tympanoplasty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of simple myringoplasty with three different kinds of autologous substitutes — Research Paper | ScholarLens