2014Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental SciencesOpen access

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RESULTS OF CARTILAGE-PERICHONDRIUM VS TEMPORALIS FASCIA GRAFTING IN ACTIVE TUBOTYMPANIC TYPE OF CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA

Rajeev Reddy

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Temporalis fascia has long been regarded as the ideal graft material for tympanic membrane repair.However it often does not seem to withstand negative middle ear pressure in the post-operative period.Tragal cartilage with perichondrium would appear to be a better graft material with good hearing outcome.It can be obtained easily with cosmetically acceptable incision.In the present study, we have compared the graft properties of Temporalis fascia versus Tragal cartilage perichondrium with respect to healing, hearing and rate of postoperative retraction or reperforation.132 patients of chronic otitis media with pure conductive hearing loss were posted for tympanoplasty.Temporalis fascia graft was used in 71 patients and cartilage perichondrium (composite graft) was used in 61 patients.Post-operative healing, hearing and rate of retraction or re-perforation were compared for both the graft materials.All the patients were followed up for 2 years.Patients where temporalis fascia graft was used, 60 (84.5%) showed a good neotympanum, 7(9.85%) had re-perforation and 5(7.04%) had retraction pockets.Patients where tragal cartilage perichondrium was used, 60(98.36%)showed a healed tympanic membrane and only 1(1.63%) had re-perforation.None of the patients showed retraction pocket or cholestetoma.Postoperative hearing was accessed 6 months after surgery.Patients with temporalis fascia graft showed an air bone gap of less than 10 dB in 49 (82%) patients and more than 10 dB in 11(18%) patients.Air bone gap closure with tragal cartilage perichondrium was less than 10 dB in 45(78%) patients and more than 10 dB in 13 patients (122%).Tragal cartilage perichondrium (<0.5 mm) seems to be an ideal graft material for tympanic membrane in terms of postoperative healing and acoustic properties.It can easily withstand negative middle ear pressure which may have contributed to the development of otitis media and significantly affect healing outcomes in postoperative period.Tragal cartilage being composed of collagen type II is also physiologically similar to the nature of the tympanic membrane.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Temporalis fascia has long been regarded as the ideal graft material for tympanic membrane repair.However it often does not seem to withstand negative middle ear pressure in the post-operative period.Tragal cartilage with perichondrium would appear to be a better graft material with good hearing outcome.It can be obtained easily with cosmetically acceptable incision.In the present study, we have compared the graft properties of Temporalis fascia versus Tragal cartilage perichondrium with respect to healing, hearing and rate of postoperative retraction or reperforation.132 patients of chronic otitis media with pure conductive hearing loss were posted for tympanoplasty.Temporalis fascia graft was used in 71 patients and cartilage perichondrium (composite graft) was used in 61 patients.Post-operative healing, hearing and rate of retraction or re-perforation were compared for both the graft materials.All the patients were followed up for 2 years.Patients where temporalis fascia graft was used, 60 (84.5%) showed a good neotympanum, 7(9.85%) had re-perforation and 5(7.04%) had retraction pockets.Patients where tragal cartilage perichondrium was used, 60(98.36%)showed a healed tympanic membrane and only 1(1.63%) had re-perforation.None of the patients showed retraction pocket or cholestetoma.Postoperative hearing was accessed 6 months after surgery.Patients with temporalis fascia graft showed an air bone gap of less than 10 dB in 49 (82%) patients and more than 10 dB in 11(18%) patients.Air bone gap closure with tragal cartilage perichondrium was less than 10 dB in 45(78%) patients and more than 10 dB in 13 patients (122%).Tragal cartilage perichondrium (<0.5 mm) seems to be an ideal graft material for tympanic membrane in terms of postoperative healing and acoustic properties.It can easily withstand negative middle ear pressure which may have contributed to the development of otitis media and significantly affect healing outcomes in postoperative period.Tragal cartilage being composed of collagen type II is also physiologically similar to the nature of the tympanic membrane.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Temporalis fascia has long been regarded as the ideal graft material for tympanic membrane repair.However it often does not seem to withstand negative middle ear pressure in the post-operative period.Tragal cartilage with perichondrium would appear to be a better graft material with good hearing outcome.It can be obtained easily with cosmetically acceptable incision.In the present study, we have compared the graft properties of Temporalis fascia versus Tragal cartilage perichondrium with respect to healing, hearing and rate of postoperative retraction or reperforation.132 patients of chronic otitis media with pure conductive hearing loss were posted for tympanoplasty.Temporalis fascia graft was used in 71 patients and cartilage perichondrium (composite graft) was used in 61 patients.Post-operative healing, hearing and rate of retraction or re-perforation were compared for both the graft materials.All the patients were followed up for 2 years.Patients where temporalis fascia graft was used, 60 (84.5%) showed a good neotympanum, 7(9.85%) had re-perforation and 5(7.04%) had retraction pockets.Patients where tragal cartilage perichondrium was used, 60(98.36%)showed a healed tympanic membrane and only 1(1.63%) had re-perforation.None of the patients showed retraction pocket or cholestetoma.Postoperative hearing was accessed 6 months after surgery.Patients with temporalis fascia graft showed an air bone gap of less than 10 dB in 49 (82%) patients and more than 10 dB in 11(18%) patients.Air bone gap closure with tragal cartilage perichondrium was less than 10 dB in 45(78%) patients and more than 10 dB in 13 patients (122%).Tragal cartilage perichondrium (<0.5 mm) seems to be an ideal graft material for tympanic membrane in terms of postoperative healing and acoustic properties.It can easily withstand negative middle ear pressure which may have contributed to the development of otitis media and significantly affect healing outcomes in postoperative period.Tragal cartilage being composed of collagen type II is also physiologically similar to the nature of the tympanic membrane.

Key concepts: Medicine, Perichondrium, Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media, Surgery, Grafting, Fascia, Cartilage, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RESULTS OF CARTILAGE-PERICHONDRIUM VS TEMPORALIS FASCIA GRAFTING IN ACTIVE TUBOTYMPANIC TYPE OF CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA — Research Paper | ScholarLens