A Comparative Study of Two Doctrines of " Golden Mean" between Confucius and Aristotle
Qian Chang-zhao
Abstract
Qian Chang-zhao
Abstract
The doctrines of the Golden Mean have had a very important status both in Chinese and Western historical development of ethics. The great ancient Chinese thinker Confucius regards the Golden Mean as the Ultimate Virtues. His Greek counterpart Aristotle takes the Golden Mean not only as a virtue, but also a kind of happiness. The paper undertakes a comparative study between the two doctrines in terms of their basic content, orientation or purpose as well as approaches.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The doctrines of the Golden Mean have had a very important status both in Chinese and Western historical development of ethics. The great ancient Chinese thinker Confucius regards the Golden Mean as the Ultimate Virtues. His Greek counterpart Aristotle takes the Golden Mean not only as a virtue, but also a kind of happiness. The paper undertakes a comparative study between the two doctrines in terms of their basic content, orientation or purpose as well as approaches.
Key concepts: Golden ratio, Virtue, Happiness, Philosophy, Ancient Greek, Golden Rule, Epistemology, Literature