2015Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical CollegeRequires access

Curative Effect Observation of two different flush drainage in Abdominal double casing

Wang Yong-hu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To explore and compare two different tube drainage in the abdominal cavity dual flush after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Methods: 80 cases of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in patients with external drainage placed randomly divided into control group and observation group 40 cases, the control group received saline flush pipe using intermittent flushing, the observation group received saline uniform drip irrigation tube.Results: The patients postoperative drainage tube plugging rate(7.5%) than the control group(30%), the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).observation group were double casing average retention time(4 days) than the control group(5.0 days),the difference was statistically significant(P0.01). Conclusion: Intraperitoneal double drainage tube flush uniform way is much better than intermittent infusion flush.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To explore and compare two different tube drainage in the abdominal cavity dual flush after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Methods: 80 cases of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in patients with external drainage placed randomly divided into control group and observation group 40 cases, the control group received saline flush pipe using intermittent flushing, the observation group received saline uniform drip irrigation tube.Results: The patients postoperative drainage tube plugging rate(7.5%) than the control group(30%), the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).observation group were double casing average retention time(4 days) than the control group(5.0 days),the difference was statistically significant(P0.01). Conclusion: Intraperitoneal double drainage tube flush uniform way is much better than intermittent infusion flush.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To explore and compare two different tube drainage in the abdominal cavity dual flush after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Methods: 80 cases of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in patients with external drainage placed randomly divided into control group and observation group 40 cases, the control group received saline flush pipe using intermittent flushing, the observation group received saline uniform drip irrigation tube.Results: The patients postoperative drainage tube plugging rate(7.5%) than the control group(30%), the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).observation group were double casing average retention time(4 days) than the control group(5.0 days),the difference was statistically significant(P0.01). Conclusion: Intraperitoneal double drainage tube flush uniform way is much better than intermittent infusion flush.

Key concepts: Medicine, Drainage, Saline, Surgery, Flushing, Significant difference, Abdominal cavity, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Curative Effect Observation of two different flush drainage in Abdominal double casing — Research Paper | ScholarLens