A review of criticism on Yu Xin
Cao Men
Abstract
Cao Men
Abstract
As a controversial writer of the ancient Chinese literary history, Yu Xin aroused continuous criticism since the South and North Dynasties. The criticism has basically followed the two parallel directions of praise and censure throughout the dynasties of Song, Jin, Ming, Qing till now. There are three main reasons responsible for the vagueness and obscurity in literary criticism: 1) the traditional political standard of person and the literary criticism model of “like author, like book”, 2) the practical emphasis of literary value in ancient China, and 3) the literary criticism approach of taking perceptual knowledge as the decisive factor.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As a controversial writer of the ancient Chinese literary history, Yu Xin aroused continuous criticism since the South and North Dynasties. The criticism has basically followed the two parallel directions of praise and censure throughout the dynasties of Song, Jin, Ming, Qing till now. There are three main reasons responsible for the vagueness and obscurity in literary criticism: 1) the traditional political standard of person and the literary criticism model of “like author, like book”, 2) the practical emphasis of literary value in ancient China, and 3) the literary criticism approach of taking perceptual knowledge as the decisive factor.
Key concepts: Criticism, Praise, Literary criticism, Literature, Sociological criticism, Vagueness, Historical criticism, Theatre criticism