2007Chinese Journal of Critical Care MedicineRequires access

Comparison of curative effect between intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C in controlling the ventricular rate of the patients with rapid atrial fibrillation

Zhang Qing-don

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare curative effect of intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C (cedilanid ) for the treatment of rapid ventricular rate in the patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods A single-blind, randomized study of 52 patients with rapid atrial fibrillation was conducted by comparing intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C. Results The total effective rate was 84.6% and 57.7% in amiodarone group and lanatoside C, respectively. Heart rate decreased by 36.5% and 25.8% (P0.05). The mean response time was(22.8±7.6)minutes and(51.2±9.8)minutes (P0.01). Conclusion Amiodarone is more effective for the treatment of rapid ventricular rate in the patients with atrial fibrillation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare curative effect of intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C (cedilanid ) for the treatment of rapid ventricular rate in the patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods A single-blind, randomized study of 52 patients with rapid atrial fibrillation was conducted by comparing intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C. Results The total effective rate was 84.6% and 57.7% in amiodarone group and lanatoside C, respectively. Heart rate decreased by 36.5% and 25.8% (P0.05). The mean response time was(22.8±7.6)minutes and(51.2±9.8)minutes (P0.01). Conclusion Amiodarone is more effective for the treatment of rapid ventricular rate in the patients with atrial fibrillation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare curative effect of intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C (cedilanid ) for the treatment of rapid ventricular rate in the patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods A single-blind, randomized study of 52 patients with rapid atrial fibrillation was conducted by comparing intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C. Results The total effective rate was 84.6% and 57.7% in amiodarone group and lanatoside C, respectively. Heart rate decreased by 36.5% and 25.8% (P0.05). The mean response time was(22.8±7.6)minutes and(51.2±9.8)minutes (P0.01). Conclusion Amiodarone is more effective for the treatment of rapid ventricular rate in the patients with atrial fibrillation.

Key concepts: Amiodarone, Medicine, Atrial fibrillation, Cardiology, Ventricular rate, Internal medicine, Anesthesia, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of curative effect between intravenous amiodarone and lanatoside C in controlling the ventricular rate of the patients with rapid atrial fibrillation — Research Paper | ScholarLens