Comparison of chromium determination in capsule shells by Zeeman flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry
Xuelin Liu
Abstract
Xuelin Liu
Abstract
Objective:To investigate effects of Zeeman flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry(AAS) and graphite furnace AAS on the determination of chromium in capsule shells.Methods:Microwave digestion was adopted to digest the capsule shells.Zeeman effect was used in the background correction.The slit width was set at 1.3 nm,lamp current 7.5 mA,and the content of chromium was determined at a wavelength of 359.3 nm by Zeeman flame AAS and graphite furnace AAS respectively.Results:For the Zeeman flame AAS method,the calibration curve was linear in the range of 0-1.0 μg·mL-1(r=0.9998),the detection limit was 5.26 ng·mL-1,RSD was 0.68%-1.0% and the average recovery was 100.0%-116.7%.For the graphite furnace AAS method,the calibration curve was linear in the range of 0-20 ng·mL-1(r=0.9999),the detection limit was 0.26 ng·mL-1,RSD was 1.7%-4.9% and the average recovery was 98.2%-105.6%.Conclusion:The Zeeman flame AAS method is simple,fast,and suitable for the preliminary determination of chromium in capsule shells in emergent cases;the graphite furnace AAS method is sensitive,accurate,and suitable for the determination of chromium in capsule shells in any case.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To investigate effects of Zeeman flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry(AAS) and graphite furnace AAS on the determination of chromium in capsule shells.Methods:Microwave digestion was adopted to digest the capsule shells.Zeeman effect was used in the background correction.The slit width was set at 1.3 nm,lamp current 7.5 mA,and the content of chromium was determined at a wavelength of 359.3 nm by Zeeman flame AAS and graphite furnace AAS respectively.Results:For the Zeeman flame AAS method,the calibration curve was linear in the range of 0-1.0 μg·mL-1(r=0.9998),the detection limit was 5.26 ng·mL-1,RSD was 0.68%-1.0% and the average recovery was 100.0%-116.7%.For the graphite furnace AAS method,the calibration curve was linear in the range of 0-20 ng·mL-1(r=0.9999),the detection limit was 0.26 ng·mL-1,RSD was 1.7%-4.9% and the average recovery was 98.2%-105.6%.Conclusion:The Zeeman flame AAS method is simple,fast,and suitable for the preliminary determination of chromium in capsule shells in emergent cases;the graphite furnace AAS method is sensitive,accurate,and suitable for the determination of chromium in capsule shells in any case.
Key concepts: Graphite furnace atomic absorption, Chemistry, Chromium, Calibration curve, Detection limit, Analytical Chemistry (journal), Graphite, Zeeman effect