Effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy in na-sopharyngeal carcinoma
Zhenyang Niu
Abstract
Zhenyang Niu
Abstract
Aim To compare the side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy in na-sopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods Among 45 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,there were 20 of IMRT and 25 of conventional radio-therapy.The target areas in IMRT were nasopharyngeal carcinoma,parapharyngeal space and neck lymphatic area with the fractional doseof 2Gy/time,for 30~35 times.The conventional radiotherapy group was given face-neck joint radiation,DT 70 Gy,35 times.The reinforcing dosage in pre-auricular field increased to DT 70 GY in the nasopharyngeal area.The total amount of neckprevention was DT 50~55 Gy.Results The CR rate in IMRT group(90%)was higher than that in the CRT group(76%).The fouth degree dry mouth incidence in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 0 case and 8 case respectively,the incidence of difficulty in opening mouth in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 1 case and 2 case respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.01).Conclusion IMRT may improve the control rate and the decreases obviously the side effects compared with the conventional radiotherapy.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim To compare the side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy in na-sopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods Among 45 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,there were 20 of IMRT and 25 of conventional radio-therapy.The target areas in IMRT were nasopharyngeal carcinoma,parapharyngeal space and neck lymphatic area with the fractional doseof 2Gy/time,for 30~35 times.The conventional radiotherapy group was given face-neck joint radiation,DT 70 Gy,35 times.The reinforcing dosage in pre-auricular field increased to DT 70 GY in the nasopharyngeal area.The total amount of neckprevention was DT 50~55 Gy.Results The CR rate in IMRT group(90%)was higher than that in the CRT group(76%).The fouth degree dry mouth incidence in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 0 case and 8 case respectively,the incidence of difficulty in opening mouth in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 1 case and 2 case respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.01).Conclusion IMRT may improve the control rate and the decreases obviously the side effects compared with the conventional radiotherapy.
Key concepts: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Radiation therapy, Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Carcinoma, Radiology, Internal medicine