2004•The Chinese Journal of Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

Multicentre clinical study on ceftizoxime sodium intravenous injection for treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infection

HE Quan-yin, Shao Yu-xia

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftizoxime intravenous injection compared to cefotaxime. Methods A randomized ,comparative, open, multicentre trial was conducted the dose of ceftizoxime intravenous was 2-3 g, bid and the duration of treatment was 7-14 days; the dose of cefotaxime intravenous was 2-3 g, bid for 7-14 days too. The total number of final evaluated subjects was 123 including 62 subjects in ceftizoxime group and 61 subjects for cefotaxime treatment group. The bacterial evaluated subjects were 54 for ceftizoxime and 50 for cefotaxime. Results Clinical efficacy rate and bacterial eradication rate for ceftizoxime was 87.10% and 85.19%, respectively. Clinical efficacy rate and bacterial eradication rate for cefotaxime was separately 85.25% and 86.00%. The incidence of adverse reaction including whole clinical reactions and laboratory abnormalities was 6.06% for ceftizoxime group and 7.81 % for cefotaxime group. Conclusion The ceftizoxime had an excellent clinical efficacy and good safety profile in treating patients with moderate to severe degree bacterial infections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftizoxime intravenous injection compared to cefotaxime. Methods A randomized ,comparative, open, multicentre trial was conducted the dose of ceftizoxime intravenous was 2-3 g, bid and the duration of treatment was 7-14 days; the dose of cefotaxime intravenous was 2-3 g, bid for 7-14 days too. The total number of final evaluated subjects was 123 including 62 subjects in ceftizoxime group and 61 subjects for cefotaxime treatment group. The bacterial evaluated subjects were 54 for ceftizoxime and 50 for cefotaxime. Results Clinical efficacy rate and bacterial eradication rate for ceftizoxime was 87.10% and 85.19%, respectively. Clinical efficacy rate and bacterial eradication rate for cefotaxime was separately 85.25% and 86.00%. The incidence of adverse reaction including whole clinical reactions and laboratory abnormalities was 6.06% for ceftizoxime group and 7.81 % for cefotaxime group. Conclusion The ceftizoxime had an excellent clinical efficacy and good safety profile in treating patients with moderate to severe degree bacterial infections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftizoxime intravenous injection compared to cefotaxime. Methods A randomized ,comparative, open, multicentre trial was conducted the dose of ceftizoxime intravenous was 2-3 g, bid and the duration of treatment was 7-14 days; the dose of cefotaxime intravenous was 2-3 g, bid for 7-14 days too. The total number of final evaluated subjects was 123 including 62 subjects in ceftizoxime group and 61 subjects for cefotaxime treatment group. The bacterial evaluated subjects were 54 for ceftizoxime and 50 for cefotaxime. Results Clinical efficacy rate and bacterial eradication rate for ceftizoxime was 87.10% and 85.19%, respectively. Clinical efficacy rate and bacterial eradication rate for cefotaxime was separately 85.25% and 86.00%. The incidence of adverse reaction including whole clinical reactions and laboratory abnormalities was 6.06% for ceftizoxime group and 7.81 % for cefotaxime group. Conclusion The ceftizoxime had an excellent clinical efficacy and good safety profile in treating patients with moderate to severe degree bacterial infections.

Key concepts: Ceftizoxime, Cefotaxime, Medicine, Internal medicine, Clinical efficacy, Respiratory tract infections, Clinical trial, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multicentre clinical study on ceftizoxime sodium intravenous injection for treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens