2011•Chinese Journal of General PracticeRequires access

Manager Experience of Laparoscope with Choledochoscope in Treatment of Cholecystolithiasis Combined with Choledocholithiasis

Junxian Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the operation and effect of laparoscope with choledochoscope in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.Methods The clinical data of 158 cases with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in our hospital from December 2006 to 2010 December were analyzed retrospectively.The patients in the laparoscope treatment group(80 cases) with a choledochus that its diameter was more than 1.0 cm and without the history of upper abdomen surgery received laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy and t-tube drainage;while the patients in the open cholecystectomy treatment group(78 cases) received open cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy and t-tube drainage.The therapeutic efficacy of both groups was compared.Results In the laparoscope treatment group,the intraoperative bleeding,recovery of gastrointestinal function and length of stay were(150.4+12.8) ml,(1.6+0.8) d and(7.5+1.2) d,respectively,and less than those in the open cholecystectomy treatment group [(300.5+10.6) ml,(3.6+0.7) d and(13.2+1.8) d,respectively](P0.05).The wound of patients in the laparoscope treatment group was small,and the postoperative pain was light.The incidence(10.8%) of complications in the laparoscope treatment group was obviously lower than that(3.8%) in the open cholecystectomy treatment group,(P0.05),but there was no significant difference in the operative time and hospitalization cost between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion The laparoscope with choledochoscope,with small trauma,less pains,shorter hospitalization time etc,is superior to the traditional open cholecystectomy treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the operation and effect of laparoscope with choledochoscope in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.Methods The clinical data of 158 cases with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in our hospital from December 2006 to 2010 December were analyzed retrospectively.The patients in the laparoscope treatment group(80 cases) with a choledochus that its diameter was more than 1.0 cm and without the history of upper abdomen surgery received laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy and t-tube drainage;while the patients in the open cholecystectomy treatment group(78 cases) received open cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy and t-tube drainage.The therapeutic efficacy of both groups was compared.Results In the laparoscope treatment group,the intraoperative bleeding,recovery of gastrointestinal function and length of stay were(150.4+12.8) ml,(1.6+0.8) d and(7.5+1.2) d,respectively,and less than those in the open cholecystectomy treatment group [(300.5+10.6) ml,(3.6+0.7) d and(13.2+1.8) d,respectively](P0.05).The wound of patients in the laparoscope treatment group was small,and the postoperative pain was light.The incidence(10.8%) of complications in the laparoscope treatment group was obviously lower than that(3.8%) in the open cholecystectomy treatment group,(P0.05),but there was no significant difference in the operative time and hospitalization cost between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion The laparoscope with choledochoscope,with small trauma,less pains,shorter hospitalization time etc,is superior to the traditional open cholecystectomy treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the operation and effect of laparoscope with choledochoscope in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.Methods The clinical data of 158 cases with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in our hospital from December 2006 to 2010 December were analyzed retrospectively.The patients in the laparoscope treatment group(80 cases) with a choledochus that its diameter was more than 1.0 cm and without the history of upper abdomen surgery received laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy and t-tube drainage;while the patients in the open cholecystectomy treatment group(78 cases) received open cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy and t-tube drainage.The therapeutic efficacy of both groups was compared.Results In the laparoscope treatment group,the intraoperative bleeding,recovery of gastrointestinal function and length of stay were(150.4+12.8) ml,(1.6+0.8) d and(7.5+1.2) d,respectively,and less than those in the open cholecystectomy treatment group [(300.5+10.6) ml,(3.6+0.7) d and(13.2+1.8) d,respectively](P0.05).The wound of patients in the laparoscope treatment group was small,and the postoperative pain was light.The incidence(10.8%) of complications in the laparoscope treatment group was obviously lower than that(3.8%) in the open cholecystectomy treatment group,(P0.05),but there was no significant difference in the operative time and hospitalization cost between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion The laparoscope with choledochoscope,with small trauma,less pains,shorter hospitalization time etc,is superior to the traditional open cholecystectomy treatment.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Cholecystectomy, Open cholecystectomy, Gastrointestinal function, Incidence (geometry), Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Open surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Manager Experience of Laparoscope with Choledochoscope in Treatment of Cholecystolithiasis Combined with Choledocholithiasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens