2005Journal of Clinical UrologyRequires access

Treatment of complicated renal calculi under percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter

Muchun Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter (EMS III) for the renal calculi.Methods:Thirty-six patients with complicated renal calculi received percutaneous nephrolithotomy preformed by ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter. Of these 36 cases, 28 male and 8 female, mean diameter of calculi is (2.7) cm (range (1.5)~(6.0) cm), huge staghorn calculi in 12 cases.Results:The stones were cleared off 34 out of 36, one section in 32 and two sections in 2. There two patients were treated by ESWL due to residual stones. Average operative duration was 58 minutes. No obvious complications were observed. Intraoperative blood loss was 50 ml.Conclusions:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter(EMS) for complicated renal calculi has the advantages of mini-invasion, less operative duration, rapid recovery, safety and effectiveness. As a result, open operation could be avoided in most patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter (EMS III) for the renal calculi.Methods:Thirty-six patients with complicated renal calculi received percutaneous nephrolithotomy preformed by ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter. Of these 36 cases, 28 male and 8 female, mean diameter of calculi is (2.7) cm (range (1.5)~(6.0) cm), huge staghorn calculi in 12 cases.Results:The stones were cleared off 34 out of 36, one section in 32 and two sections in 2. There two patients were treated by ESWL due to residual stones. Average operative duration was 58 minutes. No obvious complications were observed. Intraoperative blood loss was 50 ml.Conclusions:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter(EMS) for complicated renal calculi has the advantages of mini-invasion, less operative duration, rapid recovery, safety and effectiveness. As a result, open operation could be avoided in most patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter (EMS III) for the renal calculi.Methods:Thirty-six patients with complicated renal calculi received percutaneous nephrolithotomy preformed by ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter. Of these 36 cases, 28 male and 8 female, mean diameter of calculi is (2.7) cm (range (1.5)~(6.0) cm), huge staghorn calculi in 12 cases.Results:The stones were cleared off 34 out of 36, one section in 32 and two sections in 2. There two patients were treated by ESWL due to residual stones. Average operative duration was 58 minutes. No obvious complications were observed. Intraoperative blood loss was 50 ml.Conclusions:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter(EMS) for complicated renal calculi has the advantages of mini-invasion, less operative duration, rapid recovery, safety and effectiveness. As a result, open operation could be avoided in most patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Clearance, Staghorn calculus, Percutaneous, Surgery, Ultrasonic sensor, Blood loss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of complicated renal calculi under percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripter — Research Paper | ScholarLens